Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCP-MCA Topic 8 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCA exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 8
[All NCP-MCA Questions]

An administrator wants to create two database VMS using replicas and needs to access the same mount_path for hosting the backup files during the deployment on both VMs,

What should the administrator do on the Blueprint to achieve this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Runtime variables are used to pass information between different components of a Blueprint, such as VMs, services, tasks, and replicas. They can be defined in the Blueprint YAML file or in the UI. By setting the mount_path as a runtime variable, the administrator can ensure that both database VMs use the same value for the mount_path during the deployment. This way, the backup files can be hosted on the same location for both VMs.Reference:

Nutanix Certified Professional - Multicloud Automation (NCP-MCA) 6.5 Exam, page 25, section 2.1.1: ''Runtime Variables''

[Nutanix University: NCP-MCA 6.5 Exam Prep - Runtime Variables], video 2: ''Runtime Variables''


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sheridan
1 months ago
I'm going with option B. Replicating the mount_path across VMs is the best way to ensure consistency and accessibility for the backup files.
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
15 days ago
Yes, option B is the best choice for ensuring that the backup files can be easily accessed on both database VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
24 days ago
I agree, having the same mount_path on both VMs will definitely help with consistency and accessibility of the backup files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Replicating the mount_path will make it easier to access the backup files on both VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosina
2 months ago
Haha, option D as a 'runtime service'? That's a good one! I don't think that's even a real thing. Option B is clearly the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Linn
22 days ago
Definitely, option B is the way to go for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
28 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the correct choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
1 months ago
Option D as a 'runtime service'? That's funny!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emelda
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe setting it as a runtime service could also work. It sounds like it could be related to the deployment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacqueline
2 months ago
Option A looks good to me. Using a runtime variable makes the most sense for a configuration setting like this.
upvoted 0 times
Ilene
3 days ago
I agree, setting mount_path as a runtime variable will ensure consistency across both VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ailene
13 days ago
Option A looks good to me. Using a runtime variable makes the most sense for a configuration setting like this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mireya
2 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Setting the mount_path as a runtime replica ensures that the same mount_path is used across both VMs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
2 months ago
I agree with Myrtie, setting it as a runtime variable would allow both VMs to access the same mount_path for hosting backup files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
2 months ago
I think the administrator should set mount_path = u01/app/backup as a runtime variable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77