Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCP-MCA Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-MCA exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 5
[All NCP-MCA Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

Saving the Calm Blueprint gives the validation error for VMware Blueprints shown in the exhibit.

What could be the cause of the error?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Florinda
1 months ago
If only there was a 'copy from neighbor' option on these exams. That would make things a lot easier!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
1 months ago
I hope the exam doesn't have any 'trick questions' like this. It's making my head spin just thinking about it!
upvoted 0 times
Xenia
10 days ago
C) Number of Template devices components should be equal to the number of Devices configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
12 days ago
B) Number of Template NICs components should be equal to the number of Network Settings configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
16 days ago
A) Number of Template vCPU components should be equal to the number of pCPU configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brittani
1 months ago
I'm going with C. It's the only one that mentions 'devices', which is the key term in the question. The others are too general.
upvoted 0 times
Martha
6 days ago
I disagree, I'm going with B. The number of NICs should match the Network Settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
10 days ago
I think it's A. The number of vCPUs should match the number of pCPUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erinn
2 months ago
D seems like the correct answer to me. The number of Template VMXNET3 components should equal the number of Virtual e1000 adapters. That's the most specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Arminda
9 days ago
User3: Yeah, D makes sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
14 days ago
User2: I agree, it seems like the most specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delfina
15 days ago
User3: Yeah, D makes sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
16 days ago
User2: I agree, it seems like the most specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Starr
24 days ago
User1: I think D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
29 days ago
User1: I think D is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odelia
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. B looks plausible too. The number of Template NICs should match the Network Settings. This could be a tricky one.
upvoted 0 times
Marge
1 months ago
User2: I agree with you, User1. A) seems to be the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
1 months ago
User1: I think it's A) Number of Template vCPU components should be equal to the number of pCPU configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearlie
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense. Maybe we should review the exhibit again to confirm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's option B because of the network settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
2 months ago
I think the answer is C. The number of Template devices components should match the number of Devices configured. Makes sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
1 months ago
I see your point, but I still think it's C. The number of Template devices components should match the number of Devices configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
1 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it's B. The number of Template NICs components should be equal to the number of Network Settings configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 months ago
But I think it could also be A. The number of Template vCPU components should be equal to the number of pCPU configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 months ago
I agree, the number of Template devices components should match the number of Devices configured.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearlie
3 months ago
I think the cause of the error could be option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77