Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCP-CI-AWS Topic 4 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-CI-AWS exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 4
[All NCP-CI-AWS Questions]

An administrator has deployed an NC2 cluster in AWS.

The following configuration decisions were made:

Created a new VPC from the NC2 console as part of the deployment

Selected the Public option for prism access policy

Host type selected was i13en,metal

The administrator now has a goal of provision public internet access to a user VM (UVM),web-1, on the Nutanix cluster. The admin can access Prism Element via the public DNS of the Auto-created load balancer.

The administrator tries to create another network load balancer for the web server access. After creating the load balancer and registering web-1's IP address as a target, the administrator finds that the health check for the VM target is failing and the DNS returns as NOT Found message in the browser.

Why is the issue happening?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When creating an NC2 cluster in AWS, the account used to run the CloudFormation script requires specific permissions to ensure the deployment is successful. The required permissions are:

IAMFullAccess: Provides full access to IAM resources.

AmazonEC2FullAccess: Allows full access to EC2 resources.

AWSCIoudFormationFullAccess: Grants full access to manage AWS CloudFormation stacks.

These permissions are necessary to create, manage, and deploy the required AWS resources for the NC2 cluster.


Nutanix Support & Insights

AWS IAM Documentation

Contribute your Thoughts:

Amira
10 days ago
An application load balancer, eh? Sounds like the admin is trying to overcomplicate things. Why not just use a good old-fashioned network load balancer and save everyone the headache?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
10 days ago
But could it also be that the administrator has not modified the inbound rules under the UVM security group to allow the network load balancer to access the UVM subnet?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adrianna
13 days ago
I agree with Stanford. The load balancer needs to finish provisioning before it can successfully route traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barrett
15 days ago
No public IP for web-1? Well, that's the problem right there! Can't have a public-facing web server without a public IP, duh!
upvoted 0 times
Jaleesa
2 days ago
A) The load balancer is still in a Provisioning state.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stanford
16 days ago
I think the issue is happening because the load balancer is still in a Provisioning state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marget
17 days ago
Ohhh, the administrator forgot to open up the security group! That's a classic newbie mistake. Better fix that before trying anything else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noe
18 days ago
The load balancer is still in a Provisioning state, so it's not ready to receive traffic yet. Gotta be patient, my friend!
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77