Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nutanix Exam NCP-CI-AWS Topic 2 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nutanix's NCP-CI-AWS exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 2
[All NCP-CI-AWS Questions]

An administrator is deploying a new cluster on AWS and would like to ensure the data is encrypted. Due to cost constraints, the deployment will leverage the native local key manager (LKM).

What is the minimal number of nodes needed to support the Nutanix native LKM?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Given the company's large spend commitments as part of an AWS Enterprise Discount Program (EDP) totaling $15 million, purchasing Nutanix licenses through the AWS Marketplace ensures that the costs contribute to the EDP commitment.

This approach integrates the Nutanix license costs into the overall AWS spend, thereby maximizing the benefits of the EDP.

Purchasing directly from Nutanix or leveraging existing licenses might not count towards the AWS EDP commitment, and trial licenses are typically for evaluation purposes and do not contribute to the committed spend.

Reference: Refer to the Nutanix and AWS documentation on licensing and marketplace purchases, and EDP program details.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Cecil
1 months ago
I'd just go with A) 1 node and hope for the best. Who needs data encryption anyway? Just throw a few extra padlocks on the server and call it a day.
upvoted 0 times
Brandee
5 days ago
User 3: Yeah, data encryption is important, but we have to work within our budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
11 days ago
User 2: I agree, let's keep it simple and cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
1 months ago
User 1: I think A) 1 node should be enough for the Nutanix native LKM.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Francisca
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards B) 2 nodes. Though 4 nodes might sound more secure, I don't think the cost constraints mentioned in the question would allow for that. 2 nodes should be the minimal requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Dannie
2 hours ago
It seems like the consensus is on B) 2 nodes for the deployment with the native LKM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
7 days ago
I would go with B) 2 nodes as well, considering the cost constraints mentioned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
11 days ago
I agree, 2 nodes should meet the minimal requirement for data encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
18 days ago
I think B) 2 nodes should be enough for the Nutanix native LKM.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kelvin
2 months ago
D) 4 nodes seems like the safe choice. You can never be too careful when it comes to data encryption, right? Better to have a few extra nodes to support the key management.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
1 months ago
D) 4 nodes should provide the necessary support for encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
2 months ago
A) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cordelia
2 months ago
I agree with Caitlin, having 2 nodes would provide better fault tolerance in case one node fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
2 months ago
I'm going with C) 3. Nutanix's LKM is designed to be highly available, so it requires a minimum of 3 nodes to ensure data resilience and failover.
upvoted 0 times
Juan
19 days ago
Sounds like a solid choice. 3 nodes should provide the necessary redundancy for data encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
1 months ago
Good to know, thanks for the information. I'll go with C) 3 nodes for the deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
1 months ago
Yes, that's correct. Nutanix recommends a minimum of 3 nodes for data resilience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thaddeus
1 months ago
I think you're right, C) 3 nodes should be enough for the Nutanix native LKM.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delsie
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) 2. The native LKM in Nutanix is a distributed key management service, so it needs at least 2 nodes to function properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) 2 because you need at least two nodes for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) 1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77