Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25%
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
PL
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Cisco
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Oracle
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ISC2
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
Nokia Discussions
Exam BL00100-101-E Topic 3 Question 76 Discussion
Nokia Exam BL00100-101-E Topic 3 Question 76 Discussion
Actual exam question for Nokia's BL00100-101-E exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 3
[All BL00100-101-E Questions]
Which of the following drive 5G low latency? (Choose two.)
A
Support of up to 1 billion of IoT and sensors devices per km2
B
Lower Time Transmission Interval (TTI)
C
Higher spectral efficiency
D
Edge Clouds
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
A
by
Sheridan
at
Mar 05, 2025, 03:12 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium BL00100-101-E Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Dalene
22 days ago
Ah, the age-old debate: 'How many IoT devices can dance on the head of a 5G pin?' Jokes aside, B and D are the way to go.
upvoted
0
times
...
Francis
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers are trying to trip us up with that IoT device question. Definitely B and D for low latency!
upvoted
0
times
Jess
9 days ago
I agree, B and D make more sense for low latency in 5G.
upvoted
0
times
...
Bernardo
15 days ago
No way, it's definitely B and D. IoT devices are not the answer.
upvoted
0
times
...
Sylvia
25 days ago
I think it's A and C, they drive 5G low latency.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Fausto
1 months ago
Hold on, I'm pretty sure support for a billion IoT devices per km2 is more about capacity than latency. Let's stick with B and D.
upvoted
0
times
...
Ben
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about C. Higher spectral efficiency is great, but I'm not convinced it directly impacts latency. I'd go with B and D.
upvoted
0
times
Jacquline
3 days ago
Let's go with B and D then, they seem to be the best choices.
upvoted
0
times
...
Gladys
9 days ago
Yeah, I'm leaning towards B and D as well.
upvoted
0
times
...
Claribel
14 days ago
I agree, B and D seem to be the most relevant for low latency.
upvoted
0
times
...
Brittani
22 days ago
I'm not sure about C either, it might not directly impact latency.
upvoted
0
times
...
Stacey
26 days ago
I think B and D are the best choices.
upvoted
0
times
...
Mitsue
1 months ago
I agree, lower Time Transmission Interval and Edge Clouds are key for low latency.
upvoted
0
times
...
Tom
1 months ago
I think B and D are the correct options.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Leeann
2 months ago
I'm not sure about D, but I think A and C are also important for low latency in 5G.
upvoted
0
times
...
Noble
2 months ago
I agree with Louisa. Lower TTI and Edge Clouds are key for low latency in 5G.
upvoted
0
times
...
King
2 months ago
I think B and D are the correct answers. Lower TTI and Edge Clouds are key to achieving 5G low latency.
upvoted
0
times
Kati
5 days ago
I see your point, but I still think B and D are the correct answers.
upvoted
0
times
...
Iluminada
9 days ago
Actually, I believe it's B and C that drive 5G low latency.
upvoted
0
times
...
Lenny
12 days ago
I think A and C are more important for 5G low latency.
upvoted
0
times
...
Erinn
22 days ago
Yes, lower TTI and Edge Clouds play a significant role in driving 5G low latency.
upvoted
0
times
...
Cecil
24 days ago
I agree, B and D are crucial for achieving 5G low latency.
upvoted
0
times
...
Daisy
1 months ago
I agree, lower TTI and Edge Clouds are crucial for 5G low latency.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Louisa
2 months ago
I think the answer is B and D.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
az-700
pass4success
az-104
200-301
200-201
cissp
350-401
350-201
350-501
350-601
350-801
350-901
az-720
az-305
pl-300
Warning
: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in
/pass.php
on line
77
a
Dalene
22 days agoFrancis
1 months agoJess
9 days agoBernardo
15 days agoSylvia
25 days agoFausto
1 months agoBen
1 months agoJacquline
3 days agoGladys
9 days agoClaribel
14 days agoBrittani
22 days agoStacey
26 days agoMitsue
1 months agoTom
1 months agoLeeann
2 months agoNoble
2 months agoKing
2 months agoKati
5 days agoIluminada
9 days agoLenny
12 days agoErinn
22 days agoCecil
24 days agoDaisy
1 months agoLouisa
2 months ago