Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Nokia Exam 4A0-102 Topic 6 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Nokia's 4A0-102 exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 6
[All 4A0-102 Questions]

Which of the following regarding route reflectors is TRUE?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Brunilda
1 days ago
Haha, imagine if we had to configure a cluster ID for every single router. That would be a nightmare!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
7 days ago
D can't be right, I've heard of multi-level route reflector architectures before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nu
8 days ago
I'm leaning towards C. Maintaining a full mesh between clients seems like it would defeat the purpose of using a route reflector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
16 days ago
Actually, I think the correct answer is C) Clients should have iBGP sessions with each other to maintain the mesh. That makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
18 days ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) There can only be one route reflector in a cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eleonora
19 days ago
I think the answer is A) Only the route reflector is configured with a cluster id.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
23 days ago
I see your point, but I still think A) makes more sense because each route reflector should have a unique cluster id.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
24 days ago
Option B seems too restrictive. I thought route reflectors were meant to simplify the iBGP mesh.
upvoted 0 times
Shaun
2 days ago
B) There can only be one route reflector in a cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brianne
6 days ago
A) Only the route reflector is configured with a cluster id.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Larae
25 days ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) There can only be one route reflector in a cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
1 months ago
I think the answer is A) Only the route reflector is configured with a cluster id.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77