Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NFPA Exam CWBSP Topic 3 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for NFPA's CWBSP exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 3
[All CWBSP Questions]

What is the required density for a warehouse with 10 ft (3 m) deep multiple-row racks without an in-rack sprinkler

system that contains a nonencapsulated storing Class IlI commodity on wooden pallets and has a storage height of

18 ft (5.4 m) and 8 ft (2.4 m) aisles, and is using standard, ordinary temperature sprinkler heads?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

For a warehouse with the described characteristics, a design density of 0.33 gpm/ft is a common requirement to ensure adequate protection for Class III commodities on wooden pallets, taking into account the storage configuration and commodity type.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Rebecka
16 days ago
I'm leaning towards 0.33 gpm/ft2 (13 mm/min) as well, but I can see why 0.44 gpm/ft2 (17.9 mm/min) might be necessary for safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
18 days ago
That's a good point, the type of commodity could definitely impact the required density.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe it should be 0.44 gpm/ft2 (17.9 mm/min) due to the type of commodity being stored.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
1 months ago
Trick question! The real answer is 42 gpm/ft2 - just kidding, of course it's C. Sprinklers are no joke, people.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
1 months ago
As someone who's stocked way too many warehouses, I can tell you the answer is definitely C. You don't want to risk it with anything less!
upvoted 0 times
Sabina
2 days ago
Thanks for the insight, I'll make sure to keep that in mind for future reference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
3 days ago
I agree, it's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to warehouse safety.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
8 days ago
I think the answer is C) 0.44 gpm/ft2 (17.9 mm/min)
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hillary
1 months ago
Hmm, this one's tricky. I'm tempted to say D just to be extra cautious, but C feels like the right call here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Levi
1 months ago
B seems too low for this scenario. Gotta go with C to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Bobbye
5 days ago
Yeah, better to go with C for the required density.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
10 days ago
Agreed, C seems like the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryln
13 days ago
I think C is the best option for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gregoria
2 months ago
I think the required density is 0.33 gpm/ft2 (13 mm/min) because of the height of the racks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lennie
2 months ago
I think the answer is C. The key details are the storage height, rack depth, and lack of in-rack sprinklers, which suggest a higher water density requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Lindsey
3 days ago
I think the answer is C. The key details are the storage height, rack depth, and lack of in-rack sprinklers, which suggest a higher water density requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
4 days ago
D) 0.52 gpm/ft2 (20.8 mm/min)
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
5 days ago
C) 0.44 gpm/ft2 (17.9 mm/min)
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
12 days ago
B) 0.33 gpm/ft2 (13 mm/min)
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
16 days ago
A) 0.25 gpm/ft2 (10.2 mm/min)
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77