Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer
- Ends In
00:00:00
Coupon code:
SAVE25
X
Welcome to Pass4Success
Login
|
Sign up
-
Free
Preparation Discussions
Mail Us
support@pass4success.com
Location
PL
MENU
Home
Popular vendors
Salesforce
Microsoft
Nutanix
Cisco
Amazon
Google
CompTIA
SAP
VMware
Oracle
Fortinet
PeopleCert
Eccouncil
HP
Palo Alto Networks
Adobe
ISC2
ServiceNow
Dell EMC
CheckPoint
Discount Deals
New
About
Contact
Login
Sign up
Home
Discussions
NetSuite Discussions
Exam NetSuite-Financial-User Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion
NetSuite Exam NetSuite-Financial-User Topic 3 Question 25 Discussion
Actual exam question for NetSuite's NetSuite-Financial-User exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 3
[All NetSuite-Financial-User Questions]
Bank accounts interact with subsidiaries?
A
can be linked with no limit to multiple subsidiary
B
can be linked with any number of subsidiaries in parent: child relationship
C
can be linked up to 2 subsidiaries
D
Must be linked with 1 subsidiary
Show Suggested Answer
Hide Answer
Suggested Answer:
D
by
Twanna
at
Dec 08, 2024, 05:34 PM
Limited Time Offer
25%
Off
Get Premium NetSuite-Financial-User Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Contribute your Thoughts:
Submit
Cancel
Rodney
1 months ago
Ha! Linking bank accounts to subsidiaries? What is this, a corporate takeover? I'll just stick my money under the mattress, thank you very much.
upvoted
0
times
...
Goldie
2 months ago
D, definitely. Every bank account should be linked to one and only one subsidiary. Anything else would just be too much of a hassle.
upvoted
0
times
Lashandra
1 days ago
I prefer B, where a bank account can be linked with any number of subsidiaries in a parent-child relationship.
upvoted
0
times
...
Craig
3 days ago
I think A is better, you can link a bank account with no limit to multiple subsidiaries.
upvoted
0
times
...
Laurel
9 days ago
D, definitely. Every bank account should be linked to one and only one subsidiary. Anything else would just be too much of a hassle.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Izetta
2 months ago
I'm going with C. Two subsidiaries seems like a reasonable limit. Anything more and it might get a bit chaotic, you know?
upvoted
0
times
Corinne
6 days ago
I think C is a good choice too. It's important to have some limit to avoid confusion.
upvoted
0
times
...
Velda
8 days ago
I agree, having a limit of two subsidiaries makes sense. It keeps things more organized.
upvoted
0
times
...
Renato
1 months ago
I'm going with C. Two subsidiaries seems like a reasonable limit. Anything more and it might get a bit chaotic, you know?
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Lavonda
2 months ago
I think bank accounts must be linked with 1 subsidiary for better control and management.
upvoted
0
times
...
Zita
2 months ago
Option B sounds about right. Banks should be able to link to multiple subsidiaries, but not an unlimited number. Gotta keep those accounts organized!
upvoted
0
times
Sharika
1 months ago
I agree. It's important to have some limits to maintain control over the accounts.
upvoted
0
times
...
Martina
2 months ago
Option B sounds good. It allows for flexibility without getting too complicated.
upvoted
0
times
...
...
Paris
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe bank accounts can only be linked with up to 2 subsidiaries.
upvoted
0
times
...
Bette
2 months ago
I think bank accounts can be linked with no limit to multiple subsidiaries.
upvoted
0
times
...
Log in to Pass4Success
×
Sign in:
Forgot my password
Log in
Report Comment
×
Is the comment made by
USERNAME
spam or abusive?
Commenting
×
In order to participate in the comments you need to be logged-in.
You can
sign-up
or
login
Save
Cancel
az-700
pass4success
az-104
200-301
200-201
cissp
350-401
350-201
350-501
350-601
350-801
350-901
az-720
az-305
pl-300
Rodney
1 months agoGoldie
2 months agoLashandra
1 days agoCraig
3 days agoLaurel
9 days agoIzetta
2 months agoCorinne
6 days agoVelda
8 days agoRenato
1 months agoLavonda
2 months agoZita
2 months agoSharika
1 months agoMartina
2 months agoParis
2 months agoBette
2 months ago