Option C, for sure. I mean, who doesn't love a good price check? It's like a superpower for the modern-day accountant. 'Excuse me, can you price-check that for me in Subsidiary B?' *mic drop*
I'm going with B. It just makes sense that if I can view records from other subsidiaries, I should be able to update them as well. Anything less would be a waste of my time.
I'm not sure about A, but I think D could also be a possibility. Submitting expenses against customers in other subsidiaries could be important for some users.
D seems like the right answer to me. If I can view records from other subsidiaries, I should be able to submit expenses against their customers too. Seems like the logical extension of the feature.
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I mean, if I can view records from other subsidiaries, why can't I update them? Seems like a half-baked feature if you ask me.
I think option C is the correct answer. Allowing cross-subsidiary record viewing means users can check prices on Sales Orders from other subsidiaries, but not necessarily transact in those subsidiaries or update customer addresses.
Laquanda
1 months agoVallie
1 months agoElliott
5 days agoSunny
7 days agoCletus
8 days agoNorah
20 days agoKarol
1 months agoRyan
2 months agoMiesha
21 days agoLynelle
28 days agoJonell
1 months agoJamika
2 months agoDorothy
1 months agoRyann
2 months agoGregg
2 months agoGlenn
2 months agoTalia
2 months agoJutta
2 months agoWeldon
23 days agoRossana
2 months agoVi
2 months agoXochitl
2 months ago