Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Netskope Exam NSK200 Topic 1 Question 5 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 5
Topic #: 1
[All NSK200 Questions]

Your organization has three main locations with 30.000 hosts in each location. You are planning to deploy Netskope using iPsec tunnels for security.

What are two considerations to make a successful connection in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

To deploy Netskope using IPSec tunnels for security in this scenario, two considerations to make a successful connection are C. redundant POPs and D. number of hosts. Redundant POPs are Points of Presence that are geographically distributed data centers that host the Netskope cloud platform. You need to consider redundant POPs to ensure high availability and resiliency of your IPSec tunnels in case of a failure or outage in one of the POPs.You can configure multiple IPSec tunnels from your network to different POPs and use dynamic routing protocols such as BGP to load balance and failover the traffic1. Number of hosts is the number of devices or endpoints that will use the IPSec tunnels to access the cloud services. You need to consider the number of hosts to estimate the bandwidth and throughput requirements of your IPSec tunnels and choose the appropriate POPs that can handle the traffic volume.You can use the Netskope Bandwidth Calculator tool to estimate the bandwidth and throughput based on the number of hosts, locations, and cloud services2. Therefore, options C and D are correct and the other options are incorrect.Reference:IPSec - Netskope Knowledge Portal,Netskope Bandwidth Calculator


by Xuan at Nov 24, 2023, 07:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Kirby
24 days ago
Good point. The browsers in use is another important factor. Imagine if half the users were on Internet Explorer and the other half on Chrome - that could complicate the deployment quite a bit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
25 days ago
Exactly! And I'd also throw in the operating systems as a consideration. You need to make sure the Netskope client can work seamlessly across the different OS's in use, otherwise you'll have compatibility issues.
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
10 days ago
C) redundant POPs
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
11 days ago
B) operating systems
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
12 days ago
A) browsers in use
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernadine
26 days ago
I agree with that. And redundant POPs (Points of Presence) is also crucial - you don't want a single point of failure, especially with that many hosts. Downtime would be a nightmare.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
27 days ago
Hmm, this is an interesting one. I think the key considerations here are around the network infrastructure and how to ensure reliable connectivity. The number of hosts is definitely a factor, as you need to make sure the Netskope deployment can handle the scale.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77