Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Netskope Exam NSK200 Topic 1 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 1
[All NSK200 Questions]

Your customer has some managed Windows-based endpoints where they cannot add any clients or agents. For their users to have secure access to their SaaS application, you suggest that the customer use Netskope's Explicit Proxy.

Which two configurations are supported for this use case? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

For the use case of managed Windows-based endpoints where no clients or agents can be added, you can suggest that the customer use Netskope's Explicit Proxy. Explicit Proxy is a method for steering traffic from any device to the Netskope Cloud using a proxy server. There are two supported configurations for this use case: Endpoints can be configured to directly use the Netskope proxy by setting the proxy settings in the browser or the operating system to point to the explicit proxy destination provided by Netskope. Endpoints can be configured to use a Proxy Auto Configuration (PAC) file by downloading a PAC file template from Netskope and modifying it according to the customer's needs. The PAC file can be hosted on-premises or on the cloud and distributed to the endpoints. The other options are not valid for this use case. Endpoints do not need separate steering configurations in the tenant settings, as they can use the same explicit proxy destination and port.Endpoints do not need to be configured in the device section of the tenant to interoperate with all proxies, as this is only required for reverse proxy mode.Reference:Explicit Proxy3, [Explicit Proxy over IPSec and GRE Tunnels]


by Fatima at Apr 13, 2024, 12:51 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marg
12 days ago
You make a good point. PAC files can be a bit of a pain to manage, especially across a large number of endpoints. A direct configuration might be the cleaner solution, assuming the customer is okay with that approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
12 days ago
You guys are spot on. I'm just wondering, do you think the exam writers are trying to trick us with that 'separate steering configurations' option? Seems a bit out of left field to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
13 days ago
Exactly. The PAC file option makes sense because it allows you to centrally manage the proxy configuration without installing anything on the endpoints. And the direct proxy configuration is a pretty common setup for these types of scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
14 days ago
Hmm, I'm not too sure about the PAC file option. Isn't that a bit outdated these days? I feel like a direct configuration might be the more modern and secure approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
14 days ago
Yeah, I agree. And since the question specifically mentions using Netskope's Explicit Proxy, that narrows it down even further. I'd say the two supported configurations are A and D - either configuring the endpoints to directly use the Netskope proxy, or using a PAC file.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
15 days ago
Yeah, I agree. Options B and C don't seem to fit the requirements of not being able to add any clients or agents to the endpoints. Using a separate steering configuration or having to configure the endpoints in the device section would likely require some kind of client or agent, which is not allowed in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
15 days ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the key here is that the customer can't install any additional clients or agents on the endpoints. That rules out option C, since that would require configuring the device section of the tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caprice
16 days ago
That makes sense. So in that case, I think options A and D would be the supported configurations, where the endpoints can either be configured directly to use the Netskope proxy or use a PAC file to point to the proxy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
18 days ago
Okay, from what I understand, an explicit proxy is where the client application is configured to send requests directly to the proxy server, rather than the proxy server intercepting the traffic. So in this case, the endpoints would need to be configured to use the Netskope proxy explicitly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coleen
19 days ago
This is a great question, but I'm a bit confused about the concept of an 'explicit proxy'. Can someone explain that to me?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77