Netskope Exam NSK300 Topic 6 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK300 exam

Question #: 16
Topic #: 6

Your customer is currently using Directory Importer with Active Directory (AD) to provision users to Nelskope. They have recently acquired three new companies (

AB. and C) and want to onboard users from the companies onto the NetsKope platform. Information about the companies is shown below.
- Company A uses Active Directory.
-- Company B uses Azure AD.
-- Company C uses Okta Universal Directory.
Which statement is correct in this scenario?

AUsers from Company B and Company C cannot be provisioned because the customer is already using AD Importer.

BEither Company B or Company C users cannot be provisioned because integration with only one SCIM solution is allowed.

CUsers from Companies A. B, and C can be provisioned to Netskope by deploying additional AD Importers and integrating more than one SCIM solution.

DCompany A users cannot be provisioned to Netskope because the customer is already using AD Importer to import users from another Active Directory environment.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

When verifying that Google Drive traffic is being tunneled to Netskope using Chrome and the Netskope Client, you would expect to see log entries indicating that the traffic is being directed through Netskope's proxy. Specifically, Option A is correct as it shows the process ''google drive'' being tunneled to nsProxy. The log entry for Option A indicates that a TLS tunneling flow from a local address and process (Google Drive) is being directed to a host (play.googleapis.com) and then to Netskope's proxy (nsProxy). This is consistent with how Netskope tunnels specified traffic for security and policy enforcement1.

by Refugia at Sep 10, 2024, 12:10 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lili

Option D is just plain wrong. Why would the customer not be able to provision users from Company A if they're already using AD Importer? That makes no sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

3 days ago

Haha, option A is definitely not correct. It's like saying, 'Sorry, you just can't use our product for these new companies.' That's just bad business.

upvoted 0 times

...

Goldie

5 days ago

I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't integrating with multiple SCIM solutions be a hassle? I'd go with option B, it seems like the simpler solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cletus

16 days ago

I agree with Douglass. Option C makes the most sense in this scenario. We should be able to provision users from all three companies by deploying additional AD Importers and integrating multiple SCIM solutions.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carri

17 days ago

I disagree. I believe option A is the correct answer. Users from Company B and Company C cannot be provisioned because the customer is already using AD Importer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashawnda

18 days ago

Option C seems like the correct answer here. The customer can deploy additional AD Importers and integrate more than one SCIM solution to provision users from the different companies.

upvoted 0 times

...

Douglass

19 days ago

I think option C is correct. We can deploy additional AD Importers and integrate more than one SCIM solution to provision users from all three companies.

upvoted 0 times

...