Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Netskope Exam NSK200 Topic 1 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Netskope's NSK200 exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 1
[All NSK200 Questions]

Your customer is migrating all of their applications over to Microsoft 365 and Azure. They have good practices and policies in place (or their inline traffic, but they want to continuously detect reconfigurations and enforce compliance standards.

Which two solutions would satisfy their requirements? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

To continuously detect and enforce compliance standards for their Microsoft 365 and Azure applications, the customer needs to use Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) and Netskope Continuous Security Assessment (CSA). Netskope SSPM allows the customer to monitor, assess, and act on security, permission, and access related issues in their SaaS environment, such as Microsoft 365. Netskope SSPM continuously checks security posture by comparing SaaS app settings with security policies and industry benchmarks (CIS, PCI-DSS, NIST, HIPAA, CSA, GDPR, AIPCA, ISO, and more).It also provides visibility and control over third-party apps that are connected to the managed apps1. Netskope CSA allows the customer to discover, audit, and remediate misconfigurations in their IaaS environment, such as Azure. Netskope CSA continuously monitors and audits cloud configurations against industry standards, CIS benchmarks, and regulatory frameworks.It also provides real-time inline protection to secure public clouds from threats and data loss2. Therefore, options A and D are correct and the other options are incorrect.Reference:SaaS Security Posture Management - Netskope,Public Cloud Security Solutions - Netskope


by Lashaunda at Feb 09, 2024, 02:12 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSK200 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Mickie
10 months ago
True, it provides insights into the cloud risk posture of the customer's environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
10 months ago
Netskope Cloud Confidence Index might also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristofer
11 months ago
Yes, combining both solutions would ensure their applications are secure in Microsoft 365 and Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
11 months ago
I also suggest Netskope Continuous Security Assessment for enforcing compliance standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erasmo
11 months ago
Agreed, that would help them continuously detect reconfigurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
11 months ago
I think the customer should consider Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
11 months ago
I personally think C) Netskope Risk Insights could also help enforce compliance standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
12 months ago
Agreed, but I also believe D) Netskope Continuous Security Assessment would be beneficial for continuous detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
12 months ago
I think A) Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management would be a good solution for them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
1 years ago
Haha, the Cloud Confidence Index does sound a bit like a made-up metric, doesn't it? I bet the marketing team came up with that one. Anyway, I think you guys have the right idea. The Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamela
1 years ago
I'm not so sure about the Netskope Cloud Confidence Index (B). I mean, what does that even mean? Sounds like some marketing fluff to me. Let's stick with the Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights.
upvoted 0 times
Ardella
1 years ago
Let's go with Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
1 years ago
Exactly, these two solutions will cover our needs effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 years ago
And Risk Insights will ensure we're enforcing compliance standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blythe
1 years ago
Continuous Security Assessment will help us keep track of any reconfigurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawrence
1 years ago
Netskope Cloud Confidence Index does sound a bit vague. I think we're better off with the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 years ago
Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights are definitely more practical solutions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
1 years ago
I agree, let's focus on Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vinnie
1 years ago
I agree, the Continuous Security Assessment and Risk Insights seem like the most relevant solutions. The Continuous Security Assessment can continuously monitor for reconfigurations and enforce compliance, while the Risk Insights can provide insights into potential risks and vulnerabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
1 years ago
Okay, let's take a look at this question. It seems like they want a solution that can detect and enforce compliance for their Microsoft 365 and Azure applications. I think the Netskope Continuous Security Assessment (D) and the Netskope Risk Insights (C) would be the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77