Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NetApp Exam NS0-604 Topic 5 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for NetApp's NS0-604 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 5
[All NS0-604 Questions]

A company just negotiated a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC). They want to use NetApp BlueXP data services, but they have no additional budget for the rest of the year.

Which two licensing models can the company use? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

For companies that have negotiated a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC) and want to use NetApp BlueXP data services without additional budget for the rest of the year, two licensing models can be used:

PayGo (B): This is the Pay-As-You-Go licensing model, which allows the customer to use Azure credits from their MACC for NetApp services. It aligns with the company's desire to leverage their Azure budget without incurring additional costs.

Private Offer (D): Through Azure's Private Offer model, customers can negotiate custom pricing and leverage their Azure commitment to pay for NetApp services, aligning with their existing MACC.

Keystone (A) is a subscription-based model for on-premises or hybrid environments, and BYOL (C) (Bring Your Own License) requires an upfront purchase of licenses, which would not align with the company's scenario of having no additional budget.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Rosann
21 days ago
Man, I wish my company would negotiate a MACC. Then I could just 'Pay as I Go' and 'Bring My Own Lunch' to work. That's the real cost-saver right there!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julian
27 days ago
You know, I was just reading about these MACC deals. I think B and C are the way to go - no need to break the bank this year. Although, a 'Private Offer' could be interesting, if they can swing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincent
30 days ago
This is a tricky one, but I reckon B and C are the winners. Can't go wrong with 'Pay as you Go' and 'Bring Your Own License'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about Keystone. Isn't that more for enterprise-level commitments? I'd say B and D are the best options here.
upvoted 0 times
Edwin
23 hours ago
I think PayGo is a good choice since there's no additional budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosendo
1 months ago
I think options B and C are the way to go. PayGo for the flexibility, and BYOL to avoid any additional costs this year.
upvoted 0 times
Garry
2 days ago
Let's go with PayGo and BYOL to make the most of our Azure Consumption Commitment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
7 days ago
Using BYOL would definitely help us avoid any additional costs for the rest of the year.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
8 days ago
I agree, PayGo would allow us to pay as we go and stay within our budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
2 months ago
I'm not sure about PayGo. I think Keystone and BYOL would be more cost-effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devorah
2 months ago
I agree with Carlee. PayGo and BYOL would be the best options without additional budget.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
2 months ago
I think the company can use PayGo and BYOL.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77