Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NACVA Exam CVA Topic 5 Question 79 Discussion

Actual exam question for NACVA's CVA exam
Question #: 79
Topic #: 5
[All CVA Questions]

One way is to compare the historical percentage of bad debt losses from past credit sales with the percentage current credit sales being charged to bad debt expense to see if too little or too much is currently being charged. Another approach is:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Frederick
1 months ago
Option B is the answer, no doubt. Comparing the allowance to overdue accounts is the way to go - it's like comparing apples to apples, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeanna
1 months ago
B is the way to go. Comparing the allowance to overdue accounts is a smart move - that's where the real risk lies.
upvoted 0 times
Sommer
9 days ago
User 2: Definitely, it helps to assess the risk accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
17 days ago
User 1: I agree, comparing the allowance to overdue accounts is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hassie
1 months ago
I'm going with B as well. Comparing the allowance to overdue accounts makes the most sense in terms of assessing the bad debt provision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
1 months ago
B sounds like the best option to me. Comparing the allowance to the overdue accounts is a practical way to evaluate if the allowance is sufficient.
upvoted 0 times
Annita
1 days ago
User 3: I agree, comparing the aged account receivable schedule allowance to the amount of overdue accounts is a good indicator of the sufficiency of the allowance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
4 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that seems like a logical way to assess if the allowance is adequate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenna
7 days ago
User 1: I think B is the best option too. It makes sense to compare the allowance to the overdue accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aretha
2 months ago
But wouldn't comparing the aged account receivable schedule allowance give us a better indication of potential bad debt losses?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A) To compare the unearned revenue schedule allowance relative to the amount of overdue accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) To compare the aged account receivable schedule allowance relative to the amount of overdue accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is B. Comparing the aged account receivable schedule allowance to the amount of overdue accounts is a good way to assess the adequacy of the allowance.
upvoted 0 times
Jamey
1 months ago
So, B is the correct answer for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
2 months ago
Definitely, it's important to have a realistic estimate of bad debt losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
2 months ago
I think it helps in determining if the allowance is sufficient to cover potential bad debts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
2 months ago
I agree, comparing the aged account receivable schedule allowance to the amount of overdue accounts is a key indicator.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rhea
2 months ago
But wouldn't comparing it to overdue accounts make more sense in terms of bad debt losses?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) To compare the aged account receivable schedule allowance relative to the amount of expired accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) To compare the aged account receivable schedule allowance relative to the amount of overdue accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77