Bishop and Schroeder make the point that lack of marketability discounts should be recognized, just as they are in Tax Court, because one spouse usually gets liquid assets while the other spouse lacks:
I was torn between B and D, but I think D captures the essence of the issue more accurately. The flexibility and safety of being able to cash out is a crucial factor.
Option D seems to be the most logical answer here. The lack of flexibility and safety to readily cash out the assets is a key reason why marketability discounts should be recognized.
Louann
1 months agoHenriette
1 months agoMaile
1 months agoAlton
7 days agoFabiola
12 days agoKaitlyn
2 months agoJanessa
4 days agoWinfred
15 days agoBlossom
16 days agoFatima
2 months agoSkye
2 months agoBlossom
2 months ago