Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

NACVA Exam CVA Topic 2 Question 105 Discussion

Actual exam question for NACVA's CVA exam
Question #: 105
Topic #: 2
[All CVA Questions]

Buy-sell agreement may specify that the shares be valued strictly at their fair market value as:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Clay
1 months ago
The exam gods are really testing our understanding of business valuation here. Option B sounds like the 'fair' choice, but option C might be more realistic in the real world.
upvoted 0 times
Daren
1 days ago
I agree, option B is ideal but option C might be more common in actual buy-sell agreements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
2 days ago
It's true, option B seems fair but option C could be more realistic in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
3 days ago
I think option B makes sense in theory, but option C might be more practical.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
1 months ago
As an accountant, I'd say option C is the way to go. A specified percentage discount is a more practical approach than trying to determine a 'fair' value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
1 months ago
Haha, I guess the shareholders are trying to have their cake and eat it too with option D. Can't decide on fair market value or a discount? Why not both!
upvoted 0 times
Stanford
3 days ago
User 1: Yeah, option D seems like they want the best of both worlds.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isaac
1 months ago
I'm torn between B and D. The absence of discounts for lack of control or marketability makes sense, but a specified percentage discount could also be reasonable.
upvoted 0 times
Remedios
11 days ago
That's true. D does cover all possibilities. It might be the safer choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
13 days ago
I see your point, but D could also work. It includes both options, so it covers all bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
1 months ago
I think B makes more sense. No discounts for lack of control or marketability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lilli
2 months ago
Option B seems like the most logical choice, as it specifies the shares should be valued at a proportionate share of the enterprise value without any discounts.
upvoted 0 times
Harris
16 days ago
I think it ultimately depends on the specific circumstances of the agreement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
20 days ago
True, having both options B and C covered could provide more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
21 days ago
But option D also includes option B, so it might be a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
2 months ago
I agree, option B does seem like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marnie
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that, I think it could also be C) At a specified percentage discount from a proportionate share of total enterprise value.
upvoted 0 times
...
Onita
2 months ago
I agree with Roosevelt, because it makes sense to value the shares at a proportionate share of the enterprise value with no discounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
3 months ago
I think the answer is D) Both B & C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77