Alright, let's think this through. If the flow is in a managed solution, that means it's probably been vetted and tested, right? So adding it to a new unmanaged solution might not be a bad idea.
Wait, hold up. Isn't there a potential issue with the 'managed' part? I'm not sure if you can just take a flow from a managed solution and plop it into an unmanaged one. Wouldn't that mess with the manageability of the solution?
Agreed. While the initial solution sounds logical, the potential issues with managed vs. unmanaged solutions make me hesitant to say it fully meets the goal. I'm going to go with 'No' as well. Better safe than sorry on the exam!
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option A, but I'd want to know more about the specific requirements. Is there a reason the flow needs to be in a solution, rather than just standalone?
Haha, good one! But seriously, I think you all raise valid concerns. I'm leaning towards 'No' on this one, just to be safe. Unless we have more details on how that managed-to-unmanaged flow transfer would work, it seems risky. Better to err on the side of caution for an exam question.
Hmm, good point. I didn't consider the implications of moving a flow from a managed to an unmanaged solution. That could introduce some complications. Maybe we need to dig deeper into the details of how that would work.
Personally, I'd go with option B. Adding an existing cloud flow from a managed solution to a new unmanaged solution just sounds like a recipe for disaster. Too many moving parts, you know?
Hold up, are we sure this is the best approach? I mean, if the flow is in a managed solution, won't that make it kind of locked down? Seems like we might lose some flexibility there.
Joesph
6 days agoAja
6 days agoYvonne
7 days agoPaola
8 days agoPeggy
8 days agoAshlee
9 days agoDanilo
9 days agoAntonio
10 days agoGregg
12 days agoTiera
14 days ago