Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-400 Topic 5 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-400 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 5
[All AZ-400 Questions]

You have a project in Azure DevOps named Project1 that contains two environments named environment1 and envkonment2.

When a new version of Project1 is released, the latest version is deployed to environment2, and the previous version is redeployed to environments

You need to distribute users across the environments. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* New releases must be available to only a subset of the users.

* You must gradually increase the number of users that can access environment2.

What should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Delmy
6 days ago
Yeah, I agree with you. VIP swapping feels a bit outdated for this kind of scenario. Azure Traffic Manager could work, but I'm leaning more towards the web app deployment slots option. That seems like a more modern and Azure-specific solution that could handle the gradual rollout requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
6 days ago
But what about Azure Traffic Manager? Couldn't that also help us distribute users across the environments?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
7 days ago
Exactly. I think web app deployment slots are the way to go. It's the most straightforward solution that meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
8 days ago
True, but I think Traffic Manager is more for routing traffic between different Azure regions, not within the same project. It might be overkill for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
8 days ago
I'm not convinced that VIP swapping is the right solution here. Isn't that more of an on-premises kind of thing? I feel like we should be looking at more cloud-native solutions, like maybe Azure Traffic Manager or even the web app deployment slots option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
9 days ago
Haha, VIP swapping, that takes me back. Remember the good old days of manual IIS deployments? 'Have you tried turning it off and on again?' Anyway, I think you're right, C) VIP swapping could be a good fit here. It allows you to gradually shift traffic between the two environments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
9 days ago
Alright, I'm convinced. Deployment slots it is. Now let's just hope the exam question doesn't have a trick up its sleeve!
upvoted 0 times
...
Viva
10 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about B) Azure Traffic Manager. Wouldn't that be more for load balancing across different regions or data centers? I feel like the requirement of gradually increasing the number of users in environment2 might be better suited to something like VIP swapping.
upvoted 0 times
...
Queenie
12 days ago
I agree, this is a good question. It's testing our knowledge of Azure deployment options. I'm leaning towards either B) Azure Traffic Manager or C) VIP swapping as the potential solutions here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
14 days ago
This is an interesting question. It seems to be testing our understanding of different ways to distribute users across environments in Azure DevOps. I think the key requirements here are being able to gradually increase the number of users in the new environment and only allowing a subset of users to access the new release initially.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77