Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam SC-400 Topic 5 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-400 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 5
[All SC-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a Microsoft 365 tenant and 500 computers that run Windows 10. The computers are onboarded to the Microsoft 365 compliance center.

You discover that a third-party application named Tailspin_scanner.exe accessed protected sensitive information on multiple computers. Tailspin_scanner.exe is installed locally on the computers.

You need to block Tailspin_scanner.exe from accessing sensitive documents without preventing the application from accessing other documents.

Solution: From the Microsoft 365 Endpoint data loss prevention (Endpoint DLP) settings, you add a folder path to the file path exclusions.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To retain all Microsoft Exchange items in Alex Wilber's mailbox that contain the word ''Falcon'' and were created in the year 2021, follow these steps:

Create a Retention Policy:

Sign in to theMicrosoft 365 compliance center.

Navigate toPoliciesand click onRetention.

Create a new retention policy (e.g., ''Falcon Retention 2021'').

Specify the retention period (e.g.,2 yearsfrom the creation date).

Set the condition to include items containing the word ''Falcon.''

Apply the Retention Policy to Alex Wilber's Mailbox:

Assign the retention policy to Alex Wilber's mailbox.

Ensure that the policy targets items created in the year 2021.

Validate the Policy:

Test the policy thoroughly to ensure it correctly retains the specified items.

Monitor the mailbox to verify that the retention actions are enforced.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Latanya
2 months ago
I wonder if the developers of Tailspin_scanner.exe were just trying to be 'sneaky' with that name. It's like they were daring us to catch them!
upvoted 0 times
Carmelina
22 days ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
23 days ago
I hope that solution works, we need to protect our sensitive information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
Wait, did they say the application is 'Tailspin_scanner.exe'? That's a hilarious name for a problematic program!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced this is the best solution. Wouldn't it be better to just remove the Tailspin_scanner.exe application altogether?
upvoted 0 times
Titus
7 days ago
Brittni: That's a good point, maybe blocking the folder path is not the most effective solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colton
16 days ago
User 3: I agree with Colton, we should remove the application entirely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
17 days ago
User 2: B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
1 months ago
User 1: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christiane
2 months ago
I'm not sure, I think we should also consider other options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
2 months ago
I agree with Abraham, adding a folder path to the file path exclusions should block Tailspin_scanner.exe from accessing sensitive documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
2 months ago
I agree with the solution, it's a targeted approach to address the issue without disrupting the entire system.
upvoted 0 times
Rikki
20 days ago
User 4: Definitely, targeted solutions are key in situations like this
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
21 days ago
User 3: Agreed, it's important to protect sensitive information without causing too much disruption
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
1 months ago
User 2: I think so too, it's a good way to block the specific application
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
2 months ago
User 1: Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darrin
2 months ago
The solution seems appropriate, as it allows us to block the Tailspin_scanner.exe from accessing sensitive documents without preventing the application from accessing other documents.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
3 months ago
Yes, that sounds like a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77