Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam SC-100 Topic 3 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's SC-100 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 3
[All SC-100 Questions]

You need to recommend a solution to meet the security requirements for the InfraSec group.

What should you use to delegate the access?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

My
1 months ago
I'd say B, but only if it comes with a cape and mask. Gotta look the part, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Adria
10 days ago
D) a management group
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
13 days ago
C) a resource group
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
14 days ago
B) a custom role-based access control (RBAC) role
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
16 days ago
A) a subscription
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ligia
1 months ago
I'm going with B. I mean, who doesn't love a good custom RBAC role? It's like creating your own superhero costume for access control.
upvoted 0 times
Susana
3 days ago
Custom RBAC roles are definitely the way to go for security. It's like having a personalized key to access the right doors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
5 days ago
I think a custom RBAC role is the best option too. It allows for specific permissions tailored to the InfraSec group's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yesenia
10 days ago
I agree, custom RBAC roles are the way to go. It gives you more control over who can access what.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mila
2 months ago
Definitely not A or C. A subscription is too broad, and a resource group is too specific. B or D are the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
I'm torn between B and D. A management group could also work for delegating access, but a custom RBAC role might be a more precise solution.
upvoted 0 times
Vicente
12 days ago
I would go with a management group for delegating access, it offers a higher level of control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
16 days ago
I agree, a custom RBAC role would provide more precise control over access permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiera
17 days ago
I think a custom RBAC role would be the best option for delegating access.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominque
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is B) a custom role-based access control (RBAC) role. That's the most appropriate way to delegate access for the InfraSec group.
upvoted 0 times
Elli
6 days ago
A subscription could also work, but a custom RBAC role seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
7 days ago
I believe a resource group would be the most efficient way to meet the security requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
8 days ago
I think a management group might be a better option to delegate access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
17 days ago
I agree, using a custom RBAC role would allow for specific access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Velda
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think a management group could also be a good option for delegating access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 months ago
I agree with Beth, using a custom RBAC role would allow us to delegate access effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beth
3 months ago
I think we should use a custom role-based access control (RBAC) role.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77