Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 8 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 8
[All PL-400 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than once correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You are designing a one-way integration from the Common Data Service to another system.

You must use an Azure Function to update the other system. The integration must send only newly created records to the other system. The solution must support scenarios where a component of the integration is unavailable for more than a few seconds to avoid data loss.

You need to design the integration solution.

Solution: Register a service endpoint in the Common Data Service that connects to an Azure Service Bus queue.

Register a step at the endpoint which runs asynchronously on the record's Create message and in the portoperation stage.

Configure the Azure Function to process records as they are added to the queue.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alica
2 months ago
Yep, this checks all the boxes. Gotta love it when a plan comes together. Now, where's my coffee?
upvoted 0 times
Eden
17 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
18 days ago
Yep, everything seems to be in order. Enjoy your coffee!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
21 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janet
2 months ago
Hah, finally a question where I can't say 'it depends'! This solution is clear and straightforward. I'd give it a thumbs up.
upvoted 0 times
Lai
1 months ago
User 3: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
2 months ago
User 2: B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
2 months ago
User 1: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chandra
2 months ago
I agree, this solution seems to meet the requirements. The use of the Service Bus queue provides the necessary reliability and resilience to handle temporary unavailability of components. Nice work!
upvoted 0 times
Evette
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, this solution seems to meet the requirements. The use of the Service Bus queue provides the necessary reliability and resilience to handle temporary unavailability of components. Nice work!
upvoted 0 times
...
Leila
2 months ago
User 1: A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Micah
2 months ago
I'm not sure. Maybe we should consider other options to make sure the integration is robust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
I agree with Elke. Using an Azure Function to process records added to the queue ensures data is not lost.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 months ago
This solution looks good to me. Using the Common Data Service endpoint to trigger an asynchronous operation that sends the data to an Azure Service Bus queue is a solid approach. The Azure Function can reliably process the records from the queue, ensuring no data loss even if a component is unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
Lillian
29 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
1 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
2 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elke
2 months ago
I think the solution meets the goal because it sends only newly created records to the other system.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77