Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 7 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 7
[All PL-400 Questions]

A company plans to create an order processing app. When orders are created, the app will perform complex business logic and integrate with several external systems.

Orders that have a large number of line items may take up to six minutes to complete. Processing for each order must be completed in one operation to avoid leaving records in an incomplete state.

You need to recommend a solution for the company.

What should you recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sabra
3 days ago
Option B sounds like a real-time workflow, which is like trying to microwave a frozen pizza - it might work, but it's gonna be a mess.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
11 days ago
I'm torn between A and D. Both asynchronous solutions, but a custom workflow activity seems more flexible than a plugin. Although, plugins do have their advantages in terms of maintainability.
upvoted 0 times
Alline
3 days ago
A) an asynchronous workflow that uses a custom workflow activity
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tarra
15 days ago
I'm not sure about option A. I think option C) a webhook connecting to an Azure Function could also be a good solution for integrating with external systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
16 days ago
I agree with Thaddeus. Using an asynchronous workflow will ensure that orders with large line items can be processed without leaving records incomplete.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
16 days ago
I'd recommend option C. Webhooks and Azure Functions are a powerful combination for integrating with external systems, and they can handle asynchronous processing without the need for custom development.
upvoted 0 times
Dyan
3 days ago
I think option C is a great choice. Webhooks and Azure Functions are very efficient for this kind of integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Thaddeus
17 days ago
I think we should go with option A) an asynchronous workflow using a custom activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
19 days ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. A real-time workflow might be a simpler solution, and a custom action could still handle the long-running tasks. But I'm worried about leaving records in an incomplete state.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
20 days ago
I see both points, but I think option D, an asynchronous plug-in, might be the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
21 days ago
I think option A is the way to go. Asynchronous workflows are perfect for handling long-running operations, and a custom workflow activity can encapsulate the complex business logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
23 days ago
I disagree, I believe option C, using a webhook with Azure Function, would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
26 days ago
I think we should go with option A, an asynchronous workflow with custom activity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77