Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 7 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam

Question #: 82
Topic #: 7

A company plans to create an order processing app. When orders are created, the app will perform complex business logic and integrate with several external systems.

Orders that have a large number of line items may take up to six minutes to complete. Processing for each order must be completed in one operation to avoid leaving records in an incomplete state.

You need to recommend a solution for the company.

What should you recommend?

Aan asynchronous workflow that uses a custom workflow activity

Ba real-time workflow that uses a custom action

Ca webhook that connects to an Azure Function

Dan asynchronous plug-in

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Justine at Dec 21, 2023, 11:03 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Sabra

2 months ago

Option B sounds like a real-time workflow, which is like trying to microwave a frozen pizza - it might work, but it's gonna be a mess.

upvoted 0 times

Domingo

12 days ago

C: Yeah, option B, a real-time workflow, might not be the most efficient solution for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jess

1 months ago

B: I agree, using a custom workflow activity would ensure that processing for each order is completed in one operation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tonette

1 months ago

A: I think option A, an asynchronous workflow, would be the best choice for handling orders with a large number of line items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mona

2 months ago

I'm torn between A and D. Both asynchronous solutions, but a custom workflow activity seems more flexible than a plugin. Although, plugins do have their advantages in terms of maintainability.

upvoted 0 times

Brice

1 months ago

But D might be easier to maintain in the long run since plugins are more commonly used in CRM systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ruthann

2 months ago

D) an asynchronous plug-in

upvoted 0 times

...

Louann

2 months ago

I think A is a good choice because custom workflow activities can handle complex logic efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alline

2 months ago

A) an asynchronous workflow that uses a custom workflow activity

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

2 months ago

I'm not sure about option A. I think option C) a webhook connecting to an Azure Function could also be a good solution for integrating with external systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Claribel

2 months ago

I agree with Thaddeus. Using an asynchronous workflow will ensure that orders with large line items can be processed without leaving records incomplete.

upvoted 0 times

...

I'd recommend option C. Webhooks and Azure Functions are a powerful combination for integrating with external systems, and they can handle asynchronous processing without the need for custom development.

upvoted 0 times

Karon

1 months ago

I agree, using a webhook with an Azure Function seems like the most suitable solution for this scenario. It can handle the asynchronous processing and ensure orders are completed in one operation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronald

1 months ago

Option C sounds like a good choice. Webhooks with Azure Functions can handle the complex business logic and integration with external systems efficiently.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerry

1 months ago

I agree, option C seems like the best solution for handling the complex business logic and integrating with external systems.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dyan

2 months ago

I think option C is a great choice. Webhooks and Azure Functions are very efficient for this kind of integration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Thaddeus

2 months ago

I think we should go with option A) an asynchronous workflow using a custom activity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Annalee

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not so sure. A real-time workflow might be a simpler solution, and a custom action could still handle the long-running tasks. But I'm worried about leaving records in an incomplete state.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

2 months ago

I see both points, but I think option D, an asynchronous plug-in, might be the best choice for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karan

2 months ago

I think option A is the way to go. Asynchronous workflows are perfect for handling long-running operations, and a custom workflow activity can encapsulate the complex business logic.

upvoted 0 times

...

Beckie

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe option C, using a webhook with Azure Function, would be more efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Regenia

2 months ago

I think we should go with option A, an asynchronous workflow with custom activity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 7 Question 82 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sabra

Domingo

Jess

Tonette

Mona

Brice

Ruthann

Louann

Alline

Tarra

Claribel

Freeman

Karon

Ronald

Gerry

Dyan

Thaddeus

Annalee

Fabiola

Karan

Beckie

Regenia