Microsoft Exam PL-400 Topic 1 Question 116 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-400 exam

Question #: 116
Topic #: 1

Note; This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

A company develops a new custom connector for a Microsoft Entra ID-protected Azure Function that was created as a single tenant a pp.

The custom connector must be moved to a production environment. The connector must be visible and accessible only to users in the tenant.

You need to deploy the custom connector.

Solution: Publish the custom connector to AppSource.

Does the solution meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Joanna at Mar 07, 2025, 06:46 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium PL-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Helene

24 days ago

AppSource? Really? That's like trying to rent out your neighbor's car to the entire neighborhood. I think we're missing the mark here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kent

25 days ago

AppSource? Isn't that like trying to sell a custom wrench to the whole world when you only need it in your own garage?

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

26 days ago

Oh, I see. So the correct answer is No then.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

26 days ago

Haha, AppSource? What is this, a global takeover? I think a private deployment would be more appropriate for a single-tenant app.

upvoted 0 times

Carisa

3 days ago

User 3: Yeah, AppSource seems too public for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawny

7 days ago

User 2: I agree, a private deployment would be better for a single-tenant app.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joaquin

17 days ago

User 1: AppSource is not the way to go for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bok

1 months ago

I agree with Jina, we shouldn't publish it to AppSource.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

2 months ago

But if we publish it to AppSource, won't it be visible to everyone?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

2 months ago

AppSource? Are you serious? That's like using a cannon to kill a fly. Let's keep it simple and internal.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lonny

2 months ago

Wow, publishing to AppSource? That's overkill for a single-tenant app. Shouldn't we just deploy it within the tenant?

upvoted 0 times

Marjory

16 days ago

User 4: Publishing to AppSource is not the right solution for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tashia

18 days ago

User 3: Definitely, deploying within the tenant would meet the goal without unnecessary steps.

upvoted 0 times

...

Svetlana

21 days ago

User 2: Yeah, we should just deploy it within the tenant to keep it simple and accessible only to users in the tenant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentine

27 days ago

User 1: I agree, deploying to AppSource seems like too much for a single-tenant app.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jina

2 months ago

I disagree, I think the solution is No.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lauran

2 months ago

I think the solution is Yes.

upvoted 0 times

...