Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam PL-200 Topic 4 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's PL-200 exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 4
[All PL-200 Questions]

You need to assign 10 percent of the Qualification records to the QV queue through table configuration by using a Power Automate flow.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Junita
1 months ago
Alright, time to channel my inner mathematician! I'm going with C. The roll-up column and random number generator sounds like the most reliable way to get that 10% in the QV queue. Plus, it has a certain je ne sais quoi, like a high-stakes game of chance. Who needs Vegas when you've got Power Automate?
upvoted 0 times
Arlen
4 days ago
Yeah, the random number generator adds an element of surprise to the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
19 days ago
I think C is the way to go too. It's like rolling the dice, but with data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lili
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm leaning towards B, but I have a feeling there's a catch somewhere. Maybe the random number generator will be rigged or something? Nah, that's just my inner conspiracy theorist talking. I'll stick with B and hope lady luck is on my side!
upvoted 0 times
Adrianna
1 months ago
User3: B does seem like the most logical option. Let's trust the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, I agree. Let's go with B and see what happens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
1 months ago
User1: I think B sounds like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Latricia
2 months ago
Alright, let's do this! I'm going with D. An autonumber column on the Service Request table and assign the records that cleanly divide by 10? Sounds like a nice, straightforward approach. No need to get fancy with random numbers or calculated columns. Just let the numbers do the work!
upvoted 0 times
Therese
9 days ago
User 4: D does sound like the most efficient option. Let's go with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
11 days ago
User 3: I agree, keeping it simple is usually the best approach in these situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larue
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, that does seem like the simplest way to go about it. Let the numbers do the work!
upvoted 0 times
...
Salome
1 months ago
User 1: I'm going with D. An autonumber column on the Service Request table and assign the records that cleanly divide by 10? Sounds like a nice, straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denny
2 months ago
Oh man, this is a tough one. I'm torn between B and C, but I think C might be the safer bet. Generating a random number and using the roll-up count sounds like it would be more reliable than a calculated column. Though I do like the idea of a casino-themed solution!
upvoted 0 times
...
Loren
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B, creating a calculated column on the Service Request table seems like a logical approach to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the best choice as it generates a random number and assigns each qualification record if it's 10 percent or less of the value of the new field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
3 months ago
Hmm, this seems tricky. Let me think... I guess B is the way to go, since it uses a random number generator to assign the records. Feels a bit like a casino, but hey, gotta get that 10% in the QV queue somehow!
upvoted 0 times
Kattie
1 months ago
User1: Let's go with option B then, fingers crossed it works out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
2 months ago
User3: I agree, it's a creative way to assign the records. Let's give it a try.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
2 months ago
User2: Yeah, it's like leaving it up to chance. Hopefully, it works smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 months ago
User1: I think B is the best option, using a random number generator sounds fair.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kasandra
3 months ago
I think option A is the correct one because it assigns qualification records if the number cleanly divides by 10.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77