Microsoft Exam MS-102 Topic 11 Question 8 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MS-102 exam

Question #: 8
Topic #: 11

[All MS-102 Questions]

You have a Microsoft 365 E5 subscription.

You plan to implement records management and enable users to designate documents as regulatory records.

You need to ensure that the option to mark content as a regulatory record is visible when you create retention labels.

What should you do first?

AConfigure custom detection rules.

BCreate an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema.

CRun the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

DRun the Sec-LabelPolicy cmdlet.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

You need to assign the Security Administrator role.

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/security/office-365-security/office-365-atp

by Samira at Aug 06, 2023, 03:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MS-102 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kassandra

1 months ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I thought Microsoft 365 E5 already had all the regulatory compliance features built-in. Guess I need to brush up on my Office 365 knowledge!

upvoted 0 times

Domonique

2 days ago

A) Configure custom detection rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

1 months ago

I'm leaning towards A. Custom detection rules could be used to identify the regulatory records, making it easier to apply the retention labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yuriko

2 months ago

Haha, I bet the answer is D. The Sec-LabelPolicy cmdlet is probably just a made-up option to confuse us. Microsoft loves their obscure PowerShell commands!

upvoted 0 times

Nell

6 days ago

C) Run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lezlie

10 days ago

B) Create an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kassandra

17 days ago

A) Configure custom detection rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chanel

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but C seems like the right choice. The Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet is probably the one that enables the regulatory record option in the retention labels.

upvoted 0 times

Odette

21 hours ago

User1: I think we should go with option C and run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosalyn

17 days ago

User4: I agree, let's see if that makes the option visible when creating retention labels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tiffiny

19 days ago

User3: Let's go ahead and try running the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carolynn

1 months ago

User2: Yeah, that sounds like the right choice to enable the regulatory record option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

2 months ago

User2: Yeah, I agree. The Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet should enable the regulatory record option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lawana

2 months ago

User1: I think C is the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tasia

2 months ago

User1: I think we should run the Sec-RegulacoryComplianceUI cmdlet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gwen

2 months ago

I'm not sure. Maybe we should also consider configuring custom detection rules to cover all bases.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorthy

2 months ago

I think the answer is B. Creating an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema would help define the structure of the regulatory records, which is necessary for the retention labels to recognize them.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ora

2 months ago

I agree with Reta. Creating an EDM schema will help us ensure the option to mark content as a regulatory record is visible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Reta

2 months ago

I think we should first create an Exact Data Match (EDM) schema.

upvoted 0 times

...