Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-820 Topic 5 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-820 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 5
[All MB-820 Questions]

You are developing an app that will be published to Microsoft AppSource.

The app requires code analyzers to enforce some rules. You plan to add the analyzers to the settings.json file.

You need to activate the analyzers for the project.

Which three code analyzers should you activate to develop the app for AppSource? Each correct answer presents part of the solution

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The property InherentPermissions is used to automatically grant permissions to the table object it is applied to, but setting it to Rl (which seems to be a typo and should likely be 'RL' for Read and Insert permissions) is not sufficient in this scenario. The issues reported by the users suggest that they need more than just read and insert permissions on MyTable. Since users are unable to post sales orders, they likely need Modify, Delete, or Execute permissions on certain tables or objects related to the sales order process. Additionally, the inability to access the list page created in MyTable could be due to lacking Read permissions on other related objects or pages. Therefore, merely setting InherentPermissions = RL on MyTable does not comprehensively address the users' permission issues, especially when considering the principle of least privilege. A more tailored approach to permissions, potentially involving adjustments to the app's code or configuration to ensure proper permissions are applied where necessary, would be needed.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ilene
1 months ago
UlCop? Is that like the Avengers of code analyzers? I'm picturing a bunch of superheroes in spandex, fighting bugs and ensuring code quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
1 months ago
Wait, there's an AppSourceCop? I thought I just had to build a great app and Microsoft would let me in. Guess I better brush up on my analyzer game.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
1 months ago
A custom rule set, eh? Sounds like I can really tailor this to my app's specific needs. As long as it passes the AppSourceCop test, I'm golden!
upvoted 0 times
Zoila
8 days ago
User 3: Agreed! AppSourceCop and a custom rule set are essential for passing the code analyzers for AppSource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billye
9 days ago
User 2: Definitely, but don't forget about adding a custom rule set to tailor the analyzers to your app's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
21 days ago
User 1: I think activating AppSourceCop is a must for getting the app published on Microsoft AppSource.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louann
2 months ago
Aha! CodeCop and PerTenantExtensionCop, those are the ones I need to activate. Gotta make sure my app is squeaky clean before I submit it to AppSource.
upvoted 0 times
Stephaine
17 days ago
Make sure to also consider adding a custom rule set to further enhance the quality of your code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
22 days ago
Yes, those two analyzers will help ensure your app meets the requirements for AppSource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
23 days ago
I think you should definitely activate CodeCop and PerTenantExtensionCop for your app.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Youlanda
2 months ago
Hmm, AppSourceCop sounds like the perfect choice to ensure my app is up to snuff for AppSource. I'm not too sure about this UlCop though - is that some sort of superhero cop?
upvoted 0 times
Lashaun
7 days ago
You should consider adding a custom rule set to meet specific requirements for the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denna
8 days ago
I believe CodeCop and PerTenantExtensionCop are also important analyzers to activate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
13 days ago
UlCop is not a superhero cop, it's not a valid code analyzer for this project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franchesca
20 days ago
I agree, AppSourceCop is a good choice. And don't forget about PerTenantExtensionCop, it's important for AppSource compliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanja
21 days ago
UlCop is not a superhero cop, it's actually a code analyzer that can help enforce rules in your app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
22 days ago
I think you should definitely activate AppSourceCop, it's specifically designed for apps on AppSource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
2 months ago
I think AppSourceCop is a good choice for AppSource standards.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleisha
3 months ago
I'm not sure about AppSourceCop. Should we also consider UlCop or a custom rule set?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
3 months ago
I agree with Jessenia. Those analyzers are essential for developing the app for AppSource.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jessenia
3 months ago
I think we should activate CodeCop, PerTenantExtensionCop, and AppSourceCop.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77