Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-500 Topic 13 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-500 exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 13
[All MB-500 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have an enumeration named truckStatus that has the following statuses:

Empty

Loaded

Completed

You have the following code:

You need to extend this enumeration and add the following statuses to the enumeration: Quarantine, InTransit. You must then modify code that validates the switch statement.

Solution: Add a post handler to the method that checks the enumeration and logic for your new enumeration values using the enumeration value.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carlee
13 days ago
The solution seems logical, but I'm a bit concerned about potential edge cases. Better double-check the switch statement to make sure it covers all scenarios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
18 days ago
Quarantine and InTransit, huh? I wonder if those are for the really stubborn trucks that refuse to follow the rules. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
...
Omega
20 days ago
I'm not sure. I think we need to consider other ways to handle the new enumeration values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeniffer
21 days ago
I agree with Elmira. The solution adds the new statuses and modifies the code to validate the switch statement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
21 days ago
Ah, I see. Extending the enumeration and modifying the code to handle the new values is the way to go. Looks like a straightforward solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmira
22 days ago
I think the solution is correct because it adds the new statuses to the enumeration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
23 days ago
I'm not sure, I think we need to consider other options before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
26 days ago
The solution seems to work, but adding new enum values can be a bit tricky. I hope the switch statement handles all the cases properly.
upvoted 0 times
Lilli
2 days ago
A) Yes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
28 days ago
I agree with Trinidad, the solution adds the new statuses and modifies the validation code.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
29 days ago
I think the solution is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77