Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-500 Topic 1 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-500 exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 1
[All MB-500 Questions]

The warehouse manager at Contoso, Ltd. wants to display a tile in the user interface that will show total RAFs

per hour.

You need to create a key performance indicator (KPI) that meets these requirements.

What two components should you create? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Reta
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the warehouse manager is like, 'RAFs? What in the world are those?' Anyway, I think A) and C) are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
Lorean
2 days ago
User 3: The warehouse manager will be impressed with the new tile on the user interface.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
7 days ago
User 2: Yeah, those would help us create the key performance indicator for total RAFs per hour.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
23 days ago
User 1: I agree, A) aggregate dimensions and C) aggregate measurements are the components we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Casie
2 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident that the answer is A) aggregate dimensions and C) aggregate measurements. Gotta love those aggregate measurements!
upvoted 0 times
Felicia
12 days ago
Agreed, let's go ahead and implement those for the warehouse manager at Contoso, Ltd.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shalon
13 days ago
Definitely, those are the components needed to create the KPI for total RAFs per hour.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
14 days ago
I think you're right, A) aggregate dimensions and C) aggregate measurements are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chara
2 months ago
I'd go with A) aggregate dimensions and C) aggregate measurements. Seems like the right combination to create a KPI for total RAFs per hour.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvia
16 days ago
User 3: That sounds like the right combination for the KPI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonette
17 days ago
User 2: Agreed, we also need to create aggregate measurements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
20 days ago
User 1: I think we should create aggregate dimensions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dalene
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the TempDB table. Maybe we should focus on the aggregate dimensions and measurements for now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
2 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is A) aggregate dimensions and C) aggregate measurements. Those are the key components needed to build a KPI that displays the desired metric.
upvoted 0 times
Erasmo
2 months ago
Yes, those two components will help us create the KPI for total RAFs per hour.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julieta
2 months ago
I think you're right. A) aggregate dimensions and C) aggregate measurements are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Grover
2 months ago
I agree with Tammi. Those components will help us display total RAFs per hour accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
2 months ago
I think we should create aggregate dimensions and aggregate measurements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the correct answer is A) aggregate dimensions and C) aggregate measurements. That seems to be the most logical way to create a KPI that shows total RAFs per hour.
upvoted 0 times
Elenore
23 days ago
Krystal: I don't think we need a data entity, just focus on aggregate dimensions and measurements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
25 days ago
User 3: Should we also consider using a data entity for this KPI?
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, those components will help us display total RAFs per hour accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, A) aggregate dimensions and C) aggregate measurements are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77