Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-310 Topic 5 Question 107 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 107
Topic #: 5
[All MB-310 Questions]

The Canadian franchise purchases excess ski equipment from the US franchise. Two sets of skis are

purchased totaling USD1,000.

When the purchase invoice is prepared, USD10,000 is keyed in by mistake.

Which configuration determines the result for this intercompany trade scenario?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Billy
1 months ago
I'm going to have to go with C on this one. Three-way match policy is the way to go - it'll catch that $10,000 discrepancy faster than a ski bunny on a black diamond slope!
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
1 months ago
Ah, the joys of intercompany trade. I bet the person who made that $10,000 mistake is sweating bullets right about now. No way they're passing the 'Three-way match policy' with that one!
upvoted 0 times
Cecilia
6 days ago
I agree, mistakes like that can really mess up the whole process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
7 days ago
Definitely, they should make sure to double-check everything before submitting invoices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elin
24 days ago
Oops, that's a big mistake. They better fix that before it causes any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
2 months ago
Hmm, E looks tempting. 'Post invoices with discrepancies is set to allow with warning' - that way, I can still get this purchase through, even with a silly typo. As long as it's just a warning, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
2 months ago
I'm going with B. If 'Match invoice totals' is set to yes, the system will catch that $10,000 discrepancy right away. Wouldn't want to be the one who keyed in that wrong amount!
upvoted 0 times
Gary
24 days ago
Definitely! It's crucial to have checks in place to prevent costly errors in intercompany trades.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuette
29 days ago
Yeah, I agree. It's important to have that setting to avoid errors like that $10,000 mistake.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
1 months ago
I think B is the correct option. The system will catch the discrepancy if 'Match invoice totals' is set to yes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Noe
2 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. Three-way match policy ensures the purchase order, receipt, and invoice all match up. No way this mistake gets through unnoticed!
upvoted 0 times
Cletus
2 months ago
Yeah, it's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to financial transactions. Three-way match policy is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
2 months ago
I agree, option C is definitely the safest choice. We can't risk any discrepancies in the invoices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. We should double check the configuration to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Post invoices with discrepancies is set to require approval.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
3 months ago
I think the answer is D) Two-way match policy is configured.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77