Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-310 Topic 3 Question 98 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 98
Topic #: 3
[All MB-310 Questions]

The controller at a company has multiple employees who enter standard General ledger journals. The controller wants to review these journal entries before they are posted. Currently, journals entries are posted without review.

You need to configure Dynamics 365 Finance to help set up a system led review process to meet the controller's needs.

Which functionality should you configure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rosalind
1 months ago
Definitely B). The advanced workflow feature is perfect for this scenario. Although, I do wonder if the controller has superhuman review speeds. Might need to invest in some coffee or energy drinks!
upvoted 0 times
Ruthann
12 days ago
I think setting up the workflow will definitely help streamline the review process for the controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
19 days ago
Yeah, the controller might need some extra caffeine to keep up with all those journal entries!
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
22 days ago
I agree, option B) with the advanced ledger entry workflow seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dwight
2 months ago
I don't know, man. As long as I get the job done, who cares about the details? Just give me the answer and let's move on. (whistles casually)
upvoted 0 times
Ashanti
8 days ago
D) a manual journal approval with the journal assigned to the user group that the employees are assigned to
upvoted 0 times
...
Audry
14 days ago
B) an Advanced ledger entry workflow that uses the organizational hierarchy for journal posting, associated with the Advanced ledger journal name
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
21 days ago
A) the controller's security role so that he has approval privileges for General ledger journals
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annalee
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. C) might work too, but it's specific to the General Ledger, so B) seems more flexible.
upvoted 0 times
Desire
7 days ago
Let's go with B) then. It seems like the most suitable choice for setting up a review process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
8 days ago
Yeah, I agree. It seems like B) would provide a more flexible solution for the controller.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
28 days ago
I think B) is the best option because it uses the organizational hierarchy for journal posting.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julene
2 months ago
B) seems like the best option to set up an advanced ledger entry workflow for journal posting review. That way, the organizational hierarchy can be used to route the journal entries for approval before posting.
upvoted 0 times
Helene
1 months ago
Absolutely, having a structured workflow for journal entry review can help prevent errors and ensure compliance with company policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dong
1 months ago
I think it's important to have a system in place that allows for proper oversight and approval of journal entries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
1 months ago
It would definitely help streamline the review process and ensure accuracy in the financial records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
2 months ago
I agree, setting up an advanced ledger entry workflow would be the most efficient way to ensure the controller can review journal entries before they are posted.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesus
2 months ago
That's a good point, Kayleigh. Option D would definitely provide a more hands-on approach to reviewing journal entries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is more practical. Assigning manual journal approval to the user group would ensure all entries are reviewed before posting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
3 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. It uses the organizational hierarchy for journal posting, which would help the controller review the entries.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77