Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-310 Topic 1 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-310 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 1
[All MB-310 Questions]

A client has multiple legal entities set up in Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations. All companies and data reside in Finance and Operations,

The client currently uses a separate reporting tool to perform their financial consolidation and eliminations, They want to use Finance and Operations instead.

You need to configure the system and correctly perform eliminations.

Solution: Create a separate company in which you manually create the eliminations. Then, use that company in Financial reporting or in the consolidation process.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dana
1 months ago
I'm picturing the client's finance team trying to manually create eliminations in a separate company like it's some kind of financial origami. Let's see if we can find a way to make this process a little less tedious and a little more dynamic.
upvoted 0 times
Daniela
2 days ago
B: No
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
18 days ago
A: Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hui
1 months ago
This solution reminds me of the time I tried to solve a Rubik's Cube by painting each side a different color. Clever, but not very practical. Let's see if we can find a more comprehensive solution that really taps into the power of Finance and Operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this approach. Doesn't it kind of defeat the purpose of using Finance and Operations if we have to create a separate company? I'd want to explore other options that leverage the system's native capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
Maryanne
7 days ago
User 3: I think we should look into using the system's native capabilities before resorting to creating a separate company.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
9 days ago
User 2: Maybe there's a better way to utilize Finance and Operations for eliminations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
20 days ago
User 1: I agree, creating a separate company seems like a workaround.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kattie
2 months ago
Ah, the age-old problem of financial consolidation. This solution looks like it could work, but I wonder if there's a more elegant way to handle it within Finance and Operations. Maybe we could explore some built-in consolidation features?
upvoted 0 times
Leslie
22 days ago
User 3: That's a good point, we should see if there's a more elegant solution within the system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, but I also think we should explore the built-in consolidation features in Finance and Operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
1 months ago
User 1: Yes, I think the solution could work for the client.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desmond
2 months ago
But wouldn't it be easier to manage and track eliminations in a separate company? I still think the solution meets the goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
2 months ago
I disagree, creating a separate company seems like extra work. We should find a way to do eliminations within the existing companies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eloisa
2 months ago
The solution seems logical, but I'm not sure if it will fully address the client's needs. Creating a separate company just for eliminations might add unnecessary complexity.
upvoted 0 times
Desmond
2 months ago
User 2: Yes, I agree. It could add unnecessary complexity to the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
2 months ago
User 1: I think creating a separate company for eliminations might make things more complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desmond
3 months ago
I think the solution is good, we can create a separate company for eliminations.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77