Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-260 Topic 1 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-260 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 1
[All MB-260 Questions]

You are a Customer Data Platform Specialist. Your company implemented audience insights and Dynamics 365 Marketing. One of the data sources is the behavioral data from Dynamics 365 Marketing.

You are reviewing the segment requirements with the marketing team. The marketing team wants the segments to exclude people who already received a commercial email in the last seven days. The marketing team creates segments in audience insights and Dynamics 365 Marketing.

Which option is the fastest way to fulfill the requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Belen
1 years ago
Hmm, I don't know. I'm with Barbra and Wilson on this one. Lowering the precision just feels like we're compromising the integrity of the data. And you know how picky the auditors are going to be about this. I think we need to try harder to find a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
Ashley
1 years ago
We should prioritize finding a better solution for this issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
1 years ago
Changing the matching rule might have consequences we haven't considered.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
1 years ago
I think we should reconsider our approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
1 years ago
Let's discuss this further with the team before making any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
1 years ago
Maybe we should explore other options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
1 years ago
I agree, we need to ensure the data integrity is maintained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnathon
1 years ago
Lowering precision might not be the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yolande
1 years ago
I don't know, you guys. Sometimes you just have to do what works, you know? If lowering the precision is the only way to get those unmatched eCommerce cusWilsoners in there, then I say go for it. It might not be the perfect solution, but at least it gets the job done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
1 years ago
Yeah, I agree with Barbra. Lowering the precision of the matching rule feels like a bit of a hack. Aren't we supposed to be creating a robust and accurate Cuser Data Platform? I think we need to dig deeper and find a more elegant solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
1 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this solution. Adjusting the matching rule with the lowest precision doesn't seem like the right approach to me. Shouldn't we be trying to improve the matching process to ensure all the eCommerce customers are included, rather than just lowering the standards?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77