Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam MB-230 Topic 3 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-230 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 3
[All MB-230 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution. Determine whether the solution meets the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

An electrical engineering company is implementing Dynamics 365 Customer Service.

Engineers schedule work in one-hour blocks.

Engineers who complete a job before the end of the one-hour block must not be able to start a new job in that some block.

Engineers who require part of an additional one-hour block to complete a job must not be able to start a new job in that additional block.

You need to configure the fulfillment preference to meet the requirements.

Proposed solution: Configure the working hours calendar to allow one-hour resource booking blocks.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Glenna
5 days ago
This question is a real head-scratcher. I guess the engineers in this company really don't like to waste time, huh? Looks like we need to find a solution that's as efficient as they are.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
8 days ago
I think the solution is a good start, but it needs to be more comprehensive to meet all the requirements. Maybe we should look into resource booking constraints or calendar settings to fully address the problem.
upvoted 0 times
Lisha
12 hours ago
Engineer 1: I think the solution is a good start, but it needs to be more comprehensive to meet all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fannie
20 days ago
The solution is not sufficient. It only covers the one-hour block scheduling, but it doesn't prevent engineers from starting new jobs within the same block or the additional block needed to complete a job.
upvoted 0 times
Lewis
2 days ago
Engineer 2: I agree, it's not sufficient to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
4 days ago
Engineer 1: The solution doesn't prevent engineers from starting new jobs within the same block.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jani
23 days ago
The proposed solution seems to address the requirement of scheduling work in one-hour blocks. However, it doesn't address the other requirements of not allowing engineers to start a new job within the same block or the additional block required to complete a job.
upvoted 0 times
Micaela
9 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammi
26 days ago
A) Yes, I agree with Mari. Configuring the working hours calendar for one-hour blocks should prevent engineers from starting new jobs in the same block if they finish early.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
28 days ago
B) No, I disagree. The solution does not address the requirement of engineers not being able to start a new job in the same block if they complete a job early.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
29 days ago
A) Yes, I think the proposed solution meets the goal because it allows one-hour resource booking blocks.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77