Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam MB-210 Topic 5 Question 91 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's MB-210 exam
Question #: 91
Topic #: 5
[All MB-210 Questions]

A company uses Dynamics 565 Sales Professional.

A new enterprise sales team must be created. The sales manager will be responsible for adding members and removing members from the team.

You need to create the new sales team.

Which two values must you configure? Each correct answer presents part of the solution.

NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Malcolm at Apr 12, 2024, 08:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MB-210 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Corrina
12 months ago
I still think removing contacts using Advanced Find is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malinda
12 months ago
I think that might be a bit more complicated than just using Advanced Find, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
12 months ago
Hmm, I see. But what about copying the original list to static and then removing the contacts?
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
12 months ago
I agree with User2, removing contacts using Advanced Find seems like a more straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corrina
1 years ago
But wouldn't it be easier to just remove the contacts using Advanced Find?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
1 years ago
I think we should create a new dynamic marketing list with updated contacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keneth
1 years ago
I prefer using Lookup to remove the contacts. It's quicker and more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
1 years ago
I think copying the original list to static and then removing the contacts might be a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
1 years ago
But wouldn't it be easier to just remove the contacts using Advanced Find?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
1 years ago
Yeah, I agree. That way we can easily filter out the contacts with a credit hold.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
1 years ago
I think we should create a new dynamic marketing list for the campaign.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
1 years ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about option B. Removing contacts from the list entirely feels a bit risky to me. I'd be worried about accidentally deleting someone important. Option A is starting to sound better and better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
1 years ago
Using a Lookup? That seems overly complicated. Why not just use the built-in Advanced Find functionality that the other options mention? This exam loves to throw in weird niche approaches to trip us up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
1 years ago
Hmm, I'm not convinced. Option C seems more robust to me, creating a static copy of the list and then removing the problem contacts. That way you have a backup of the original list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
1 years ago
I'm leaning towards option B. It's straightforward and gets the job done quickly. Plus, we can always recreate the list later if we need to. *shrugs* What do you all think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorethea
1 years ago
I agree, this question seems a bit too specific. But let's take a look at the options. I think B is the best answer - using Advanced Find to remove the contacts on credit hold seems the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
Tatum
1 years ago
Great, looks like we're all leaning towards A then. Let's go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
1 years ago
In that case, I'll go with A as well. It seems like a more efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
1 years ago
Hmm, A does seem like a good idea. It could potentially make things easier in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
1 years ago
But wouldn't creating a new dynamic marketing list be a better option? That's what A suggests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 years ago
I agree, D could be an alternative solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 years ago
I think D could also work, using a Lookup to remove the contacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 years ago
B
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Apolonia
1 years ago
This question is tricky. I don't like how it's trying to catch us on the details of handling marketing lists with contacts on credit hold. That feels like a niche use case that isn't really core to the exam objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
1 years ago
Option C sounds interesting, but I'm not sure I trust making a static copy of the list. What if something changes down the line? I'd rather go with a dynamic solution like option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
1 years ago
Haha, I can just imagine the sales manager's face when they realized they forgot about the credit holds! *chuckles* Anyway, I agree with Reuben - option A seems like the safest bet. We don't want to accidentally delete anyone important.
upvoted 0 times
Oneida
1 years ago
Definitely. Adding both marketing lists to the campaign ensures we don't miss out on anyone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
1 years ago
I agree. Option A seems like the safest choice to avoid accidentally deleting important contacts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
1 years ago
Yes, I think creating a new dynamic marketing list with both original and updated contacts is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reuben
1 years ago
I think option A is the way to go. Creating a new dynamic list with the right fields will make it easy to keep the contacts but filter out the ones with credit holds. Plus, having both lists in the campaign gives us more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elinore
1 years ago
This is a tricky question! We need to be really careful about how we handle contacts with credit holds. I'm not sure if I agree with just removing them from the list - we should probably find a way to keep them but not include them in the campaign.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77