Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam DP-900 Topic 11 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-900 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 11
[All DP-900 Questions]

You have a SQL pool in Azure Synapse Analytics that is only used actively every night for eight hours.

You need to minimize the cost of the SQL pool during idle times. The solution must ensure that the data

remains intact.

What should you do on the SQL pool?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Salena
1 months ago
Pause the pool? More like 'pause the party' for those idle hours. But hey, at least you'll be saving some cash in the process. It's a win-win, right? Cha-ching!
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
1 months ago
A) Scale down the DWUs - Not a bad idea, but it doesn't really address the 'idle time' problem. You'd still be paying for the compute resources, just at a lower level. Pausing the pool is definitely the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
2 days ago
B) Pause the pool
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
15 days ago
A) Scale down the DWUs
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lettie
2 months ago
D) Delete the pool? Seriously? That's like throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I'm pretty sure the question said the data needs to remain intact, and deleting the pool would just be a waste of time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
Rory
18 days ago
C) Create a user-defined restore point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
20 days ago
B) Pause the pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
1 months ago
A) Scale down the data warehouse units (DWUs).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dick
2 months ago
I'm torn between B and C. Pausing the pool is the easiest, but creating a user-defined restore point could be handy if you need to quickly restore the pool later. Hmm, decisions, decisions.
upvoted 0 times
Effie
26 days ago
C) Create a user-defined restore point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corinne
28 days ago
B) Pause the pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
1 months ago
A) Scale down the data warehouse units (DWUs).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Berry
2 months ago
I think scaling down the data warehouse units could also be a good option to consider. It might help in reducing costs while keeping the data intact.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
2 months ago
I agree with Christoper. Pausing the pool seems like the best option to save money.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
2 months ago
B) Pause the pool - This is the most obvious choice. Pausing the pool will stop the compute resources and reduce the cost during idle times. The data will remain intact, and you can resume the pool when needed.
upvoted 0 times
Yan
2 months ago
B) Pause the pool - This is the most obvious choice. Pausing the pool will stop the compute resources and reduce the cost during idle times. The data will remain intact, and you can resume the pool when needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
2 months ago
A) Scale down the data warehouse units (DWUs).
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christoper
2 months ago
I think we should pause the pool to minimize costs during idle times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
2 months ago
I disagree. I think scaling down the data warehouse units (DWUs) would be more cost-effective in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
2 months ago
I agree with Wilbert. Pausing the pool seems like the best option to save costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
2 months ago
I think we should pause the pool to minimize cost during idle times.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77