Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam DP-300 Topic 6 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-300 exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 6
[All DP-300 Questions]

You plan to move two 100-GB databases to Azure.

You need to dynamically scale resources consumption based on workloads. The solution must minimize

downtime during scaling operations.

What should you use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/site-recovery/site-recovery-sql#combining-bcdr-technologies-with-site-recovery


by Nathan at Aug 04, 2024, 06:34 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DP-300 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Valentine
1 months ago
Option D, huh? Guess they forgot to include the 'Azure' part in the name. I'll stick with the real deal, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
...
William
1 months ago
Option B? Are you kidding me? Hosting SQL Server on a VM? That's so 2010. I want the full power of the cloud, not some half-baked solution. Definitely going with option A!
upvoted 0 times
Avery
4 days ago
I want the full power of the cloud, not some half-baked solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantay
10 days ago
Option B? Are you kidding me? Hosting SQL Server on a VM? That's so 2010.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leah
2 months ago
Option C seems promising, but I'm not sure if I want to deal with the added complexity of a Managed Instance. Might as well keep it simple with option A and the elastic pool.
upvoted 0 times
Lisha
22 days ago
I prefer option A as well, simplicity is key when it comes to minimizing downtime during scaling operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
29 days ago
User 3: I agree, minimizing downtime is key when moving databases to Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
1 months ago
I think option C could be worth considering for better performance, even with the added complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, it's a simple solution that can dynamically scale resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
1 months ago
User 1: I think option A with the elastic pool is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cletus
1 months ago
I agree, option A with the elastic pool seems like the best choice for dynamic scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daron
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about option A. What if my databases have different scaling requirements? Wouldn't it be better to go with option D and have two single Azure SQL databases instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. Elastic pools allow me to dynamically scale resources based on workloads, and minimize downtime during scaling operations. Sounds like the perfect fit for my databases.
upvoted 0 times
Thora
20 days ago
User 4: It's settled then, option A it is for moving those 100-GB databases to Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
28 days ago
User 3: Elastic pools definitely provide the flexibility to scale resources as needed without causing downtime. Option A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, using two Azure SQL Databases in an elastic pool seems like the best choice for your scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
2 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the way to go. Elastic pools allow me to dynamically scale resources based on workloads, and minimize downtime during scaling operations. Sounds like the perfect fit for my databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lelia
3 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think we should use two databases in an Azure SQL Managed instance for better scalability and performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
3 months ago
I agree with Oneida. Using an elastic pool will allow us to dynamically scale resources based on workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oneida
3 months ago
I think we should use two Azure SQL Databases in an elastic pool.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77