Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam DP-203 Topic 4 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-203 exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 4
[All DP-203 Questions]

You have an Azure Synapse Analytics dedicated SQL pool named Pcol1. Pool1 contains a table named tablet

You load 5 TB of data into table1.

You need to ensure that column store compression is maximized for table1.

Which statement should you execute?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lorenza
2 months ago
Wait, hold up! Did someone say 5 TB of data? I hope they've got a big enough hard drive for that... or maybe they should just compress the whole Azure Synapse instance, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Glendora
1 days ago
D) ALTER INDEX ALL on table REORGANIZE
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
17 days ago
B) DBCC DBREINOEX (table)
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
1 months ago
A) ALTER INDEX ALL on table REBUILD
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
2 months ago
Option B looks promising, but I'm worried it might cause some unexpected side effects. Better stick with the good old ALTER INDEX REBUILD.
upvoted 0 times
Haley
7 days ago
Yeah, ALTER INDEX REBUILD is the way to go to ensure column store compression is maximized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
14 days ago
I agree, ALTER INDEX REBUILD is a safe bet for maximizing compression.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
19 days ago
I think option A is the best choice. It will maximize column store compression for table1.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaun
2 months ago
I'm going with option D. Reorganizing the index sounds like a more efficient way to optimize the compression, without the need for a full rebuild.
upvoted 0 times
Elin
7 days ago
Yes, reorganizing the index is a good way to optimize compression without a full rebuild.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emiko
8 days ago
I would go with option D as well, it seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
18 days ago
I agree, reorganizing the index should help maximize compression.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
1 months ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Anissa
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't DBCC DBREINOEX be better since it's designed for compressing column store indexes?
upvoted 0 times
Salome
1 months ago
User2: I agree, DBCC DBREINOEX is specifically designed for compressing column store indexes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
1 months ago
User1: I think option B) DBCC DBREINOEX (table) would be the best choice for maximizing column store compression.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 months ago
User2: I agree, DBCC DBREINOEX is specifically designed for compressing column store indexes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
2 months ago
User1: I think option B) DBCC DBREINOEX (table) would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elmira
2 months ago
I think option A is the correct answer. Rebuilding the index should maximize the column store compression for table1.
upvoted 0 times
Celestina
1 months ago
Let's go with option A then, it seems like the most effective solution
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
1 months ago
Option A sounds like the best choice for optimizing column store compression
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 months ago
I agree, rebuilding the index should help maximize compression
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
2 months ago
Option A) ALTER INDEX ALL on table REBUILD
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickie
2 months ago
I see your point, but I still think A) ALTER INDEX ALL on table REBUILD is the best option for maximizing column store compression.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D) ALTER INDEX ALL on table REORGANIZE.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickie
3 months ago
I think the correct statement to execute is A) ALTER INDEX ALL on table REBUILD.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77