Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam DP-203 Topic 1 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-203 exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 1
[All DP-203 Questions]

What should you recommend to prevent users outside the Litware on-premises network from accessing the analytical data store?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Benedict
2 months ago
Personally, I'm leaning towards the database-level firewall IP rule (C). It's like putting a big 'keep out' sign on the data, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Melodie
27 days ago
I see your point, but I still think the database-level firewall IP rule is the most secure choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
1 months ago
I think a server-level virtual network rule could also work to prevent unauthorized access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
1 months ago
I agree, the database-level firewall IP rule seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amie
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm thinking the database-level virtual network rule (B) is the way to go. It's like a virtual moat, protecting the data castle!
upvoted 0 times
Scarlet
10 days ago
True, it's important to have multiple layers of protection for sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
12 days ago
I think a database-level firewall IP rule might be more secure than a server-level rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
14 days ago
A database-level firewall IP rule could also provide an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
17 days ago
But wouldn't a server-level virtual network rule also work to prevent unauthorized access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
1 months ago
I agree, a database-level virtual network rule sounds like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 months ago
I think a server-level virtual network rule might also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
1 months ago
I agree, a database-level virtual network rule sounds like a strong defense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brittni
2 months ago
Ooh, I bet the server-level virtual network rule (A) is the answer. Keeps everything nice and tidy on the server side, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawana
2 months ago
Wait, wait, wait. What about that database-level firewall IP rule (C)? Seems like a nice, comprehensive solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
Twila
1 months ago
I agree, a server-level virtual network rule (A) would provide better protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
2 months ago
I think a server-level virtual network rule (A) would be more effective in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
Oh, I don't know. That server-level firewall IP rule (D) sounds like it might be the way to go. Gotta keep those pesky outsiders out!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the database-level virtual network rule (B) is the way to go. Keeps things nice and secure, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittney
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe a database-level firewall IP rule would provide better security for the analytical data store.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
3 months ago
I agree with Lonna, a server-level virtual network rule would be the best option to prevent unauthorized access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
3 months ago
I think we should recommend a server-level virtual network rule.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77