Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam DP-203 Topic 1 Question 111 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's DP-203 exam
Question #: 111
Topic #: 1
[All DP-203 Questions]

You have an Azure Data Factory pipeline named pipeline1 that includes a Copy activity named Copy1. Copy1 has the following configurations:

* The source of Copy1 is a table in an on-premises Microsoft SQL Server instance that is accessed by using a linked service connected via a self-hosted integration runtime.

* The sink of Copy1 uses a table in an Azure SQL database that is accessed by using a linked service connected via an Azure integration runtime.

You need to maximize the amount of compute resources available to Copy1. The solution must minimize administrative effort.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jacquline
7 days ago
I'm feeling option A, my dude. Scaling up the data flow runtime of the Azure integration runtime just seems like the easiest and most straightforward solution. Plus, who doesn't love a little bit of cloud-based computing magic? *waves wand* Abracadabra, instant compute power!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shakira
24 days ago
That's a good point, maybe we should consider scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennifer
25 days ago
But wouldn't scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime also help in maximizing resources?
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
25 days ago
Oh, this is a tricky one. I think I'll have to go with option B. Scaling up the Azure integration runtime's data flow runtime and scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime seems like the best way to get the most bang for your buck. And let's be honest, who doesn't love a good data center power play? *cue evil laughter*
upvoted 0 times
Delsie
3 days ago
User2: Yeah, scaling up and out seems like the best way to maximize resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
17 days ago
User1: I agree, option B sounds like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irma
28 days ago
I agree with Shakira, it will maximize the compute resources available to Copy1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
1 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with C on this one. Scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime is the way to go. Who needs all that fancy Azure integration runtime stuff when you can just beef up your on-premises hardware? Plus, it's probably cheaper, right? *wink, wink*
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 months ago
Hmm, I think I'd go with option B. Scaling up the Azure integration runtime's data flow runtime and scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime seems like the best way to maximize the compute resources without too much administrative effort. Gotta love those Azure resources, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Ruby
6 days ago
Definitely, scaling up the Azure integration runtime and scaling out the self-hosted integration runtime seems like the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
13 days ago
Option B sounds like the way to go. It's all about maximizing those compute resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shakira
1 months ago
I think we should scale up the data flow runtime of the Azure integration runtime.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77