Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-700 Topic 8 Question 53 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam
Question #: 53
Topic #: 8
[All AZ-700 Questions]

You plan to implement an Azure virtual network that will contain 10 virtual subnets. The subnets will use IPv6 addresses. Each subnet will host up to 200 load-balanced virtual machines.

You need to recommend a load balancing solution for the virtual network. The solution must meet the following requirements:

* The virtual machines and the load balancer must be accessible only from the virtual network.

* Costs must be minimized.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Xuan at Feb 08, 2024, 05:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-700 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Raylene
11 months ago
Well, it looks like we have different opinions. We should carefully analyze the features and costs of each option before making a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
11 months ago
I personally would go with Azure Application Gateway v2, I think it offers more advanced features that could be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
11 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Azure Standard Load Balancer is more cost-effective for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
11 months ago
But what about Azure Application Gateway v2? Wouldn't that also meet the requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
11 months ago
I agree, Azure Standard Load Balancer seems like the best option to ensure accessibility and minimize costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
12 months ago
I think we should go with Azure Standard Load Balancer for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
12 months ago
I think Basic Azure Load Balancer might be the most cost-effective option for us.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
12 months ago
I'm not sure, but maybe Azure Standard Load Balancer could also work for our requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
1 years ago
I agree, Azure Application Gateway v2 would be a good choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
1 years ago
I think we should go with Azure Application Gateway v1 or v2 for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
1 years ago
You raise a good point, but the requirement to minimize costs is a big factor here. The Application Gateway, especially the v2 version, is going to be more expensive than the Standard Load Balancer. If we can get the job done with the Standard Load Balancer, I think that's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
1 years ago
Hold on, I'm not so sure. The question mentions 'load-balanced virtual machines', which makes me think the Application Gateway might be a better fit. It provides more advanced load balancing and traffic management features than the basic Standard Load Balancer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawnda
1 years ago
I agree with you, the Standard Load Balancer seems like the way to go. It's designed to work within a virtual network, and it's a more cost-effective solution than the Application Gateway. Plus, I heard the Standard Load Balancer can handle IPv6 traffic, which is a must for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latrice
1 years ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. I think the key here is to focus on the requirements - the virtual machines and load balancer must be accessible only from the virtual network, and we need to minimize costs. Based on that, I would say option C, the Azure Standard Load Balancer, is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
Marget
1 years ago
So, it looks like we are all in agreement that Azure Standard Load Balancer is the right choice for this setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
1 years ago
Definitely, we need to make sure the solution meets all the necessary criteria while keeping costs optimized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
1 years ago
That makes sense. It's important to consider both the requirements and cost when choosing a load balancing solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leanna
1 years ago
No, I don't think Azure Application Gateway v1 or v2 are the best choice here. They might be more expensive and not as suitable for this specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 years ago
What about the other options like Azure Application Gateway v1 or v2? Do you think they could also work?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
1 years ago
I agree, the Azure Standard Load Balancer seems like the most cost-effective option that meets the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mica
1 years ago
Option C, the Azure Standard Load Balancer, is the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77