Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-700 Topic 4 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-700 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-700 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have two Azure virtual networks named Vnet1 and Vnet2.

You have a Windows 10 device named Client1 that connects to Vnet1 by using a Point-to-Site (P2S) IKEv2 VPN.

You implement virtual network peering between Vnet1 and Vnet2. Vnet1 allows gateway transit. Vnet2 can use the remote gateway.

You discover that Client1 cannot communicate with Vnet2.

You need to ensure that Client1 can communicate with Vnet2.

Solution: You enable BGP on the gateway of Vnet1.

Does this meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Reiko
1 months ago
The solution seems reasonable, but I can't help but wonder if there's a more elegant way to achieve the goal. Maybe we could just call the Azure fairies and have them wave their magic wands?
upvoted 0 times
Lynsey
6 days ago
User2: Yeah, that sounds like a solid solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sophia
13 days ago
User1: I think enabling BGP on the gateway of Vnet1 should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozell
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of virtual network peering. If it doesn't work, just add more routing protocols! It's like playing Tetris with network configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
1 months ago
Hold on, does this mean I'll have to configure BGP on my poor little Windows 10 device? That sounds like a lot of work! Can't we just use some kind of magic Azure button instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
1 months ago
I'm not sure that enabling BGP is the right solution here. Isn't there another way to enable connectivity between the virtual networks without modifying the VPN client's configuration?
upvoted 0 times
Howard
2 days ago
I think enabling BGP on the gateway of Vnet1 might be the right solution to ensure connectivity between the virtual networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
4 days ago
B) No
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
19 days ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
Enabling BGP on the Vnet1 gateway is a good solution. It allows for dynamic routing between the virtual networks, which should enable Client1 to communicate with Vnet2.
upvoted 0 times
Tracie
4 days ago
That makes sense. BGP will help with dynamic routing between the virtual networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
18 days ago
Enabling BGP on the Vnet1 gateway should allow Client1 to communicate with Vnet2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
1 months ago
A) Yes
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maurine
3 months ago
So, should we go with option A) Yes then?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
3 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think enabling BGP on Vnet1 might help Client1 communicate with Vnet2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
3 months ago
I think the solution is to enable BGP on the gateway of Vnet1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77