Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-500 Topic 3 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-500 exam
Question #: 70
Topic #: 3
[All AZ-500 Questions]

Your company has an Active Directory forest with a single domain, named weylandindustries.com. They also have an Azure Active Directory (Azure AD) tenant with the same name.

After syncing all on-premises identities to Azure AD, you are informed that users with a givenName attribute starting with LAB should not be allowed to sync to

Azure AD.

Which of the following actions should you take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Desirae at Sep 14, 2024, 11:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-500 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sommer
1 months ago
Active Directory Users and Computers? Really? That's like trying to use a rotary phone to send a text message. The Sync Rules Editor is where it's at.
upvoted 0 times
Deeanna
6 days ago
User 1: I agree, Active Directory Users and Computers is outdated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janine
1 months ago
Haha, network traffic filtering on the Firewall? I'm pretty sure that's not going to help with filtering users in Azure AD. Talk about overkill!
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 months ago
A DNAT rule on the Firewall? What is this, the 90s? That's not even close to the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
2 days ago
D) You should make use of Active Directory Users and Computers to create an attribute-based filtering rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
23 days ago
A) You should make use of the Synchronization Rules Editor to create an attribute-based filtering rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleta
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Maybe we should consider using Active Directory Users and Computers instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephane
2 months ago
I agree with Lauryn. That seems like the most appropriate action to take in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
2 months ago
I think we should make use of the Synchronization Rules Editor to create an attribute-based filtering rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
3 months ago
The Synchronization Rules Editor is definitely the way to go here. I've used it before to filter user attributes, and it's super straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Jenelle
24 days ago
I agree, it's the most efficient way to filter user attributes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryrose
26 days ago
A) You should make use of the Synchronization Rules Editor to create an attribute-based filtering rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
2 months ago
That's right, the Synchronization Rules Editor is the best tool for this task.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
2 months ago
A) You should make use of the Synchronization Rules Editor to create an attribute-based filtering rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77