Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-400 Topic 5 Question 90 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-400 exam
Question #: 90
Topic #: 5
[All AZ-400 Questions]

You have an app named App1 that you release by using Azure Pipelines. App1 has the versions shown in the following table.

You complete a code change to fix a bug that was introduced in version 3.4.3.

Which version number should you assign to the release?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bonita
1 years ago
I think 3.4.4 makes sense since it's just a bug fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
1 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think version 3.5.0 could also be a valid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 years ago
I agree with Alayna, because it's the next logical version number after 3.4.3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alayna
1 years ago
I think we should assign version 3.4.4 to the release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
1 years ago
That's a valid point, Earnestine. It's true that our code change was simply a bug fix, which may align more closely with a patch version increment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
1 years ago
I see your points, but I'm leaning towards B) 3.4.8. I think it strikes a balance between a minor and patch version increment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
1 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C) 3.5.0 because the bug fix represents a significant change warranting a minor version update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
1 years ago
I think the answer is A) 3.4.4 because it's the next logical version after 3.4.3.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
1 years ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. What if the bug fix required more significant changes? In that case, wouldn't it be better to go with a minor version bump, like 3.5.0? That way, we can signal to users that there are more than just a simple patch update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melda
1 years ago
You know, I was just thinking about how these version numbers remind me of my old high school locker combination. 3.4.3, 3.4.4 - it's like a secret code! *chuckles* Anyway, I also think 3.4.4 is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
1 years ago
I agree with Marlon. Bumping the patch version by 1 is the standard practice when fixing a bug. Going with 3.4.4 seems like the most appropriate version number for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
1 years ago
I think this question is straightforward. Since the bug was introduced in version 3.4.3, the logical choice would be to go with version 3.4.4 for the release. Anything higher than that doesn't make sense.
upvoted 0 times
Noe
1 years ago
D) 4.0.1
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
1 years ago
Exactly, that's the version number you should assign for the release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
1 years ago
A) 3.4.4
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
1 years ago
Not quite, for bug fixes, you typically only increment the last digit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reiko
1 years ago
C) 3.5.0
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
1 years ago
That's correct. You want to increment the last digit to indicate a patch release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
1 years ago
A) 3.4.4
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a