Microsoft Exam AZ-400 Topic 2 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-400 exam

Question #: 104
Topic #: 2

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a questionin this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

Your company uses Azure DevOps to manage the build and release processes for applications.

You use a Git repository for applications source control.

You need to implement a pull request strategy that reduces the history volume in the master branch.

Solution: You implement a pull request strategy that uses fast-forward merges.

Does this meet the goal?

AYes

BNo

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Dortha at Aug 23, 2024, 03:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-400 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Sylvia

1 months ago

Ah, the age-old battle between keeping the commit history tidy and maintaining a clear timeline. This fast-forward merge seems like a smart compromise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawna

1 months ago

The pull request strategy is the real MVP here. Reducing the history volume in the master branch is a game-changer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dierdre

1 months ago

Haha, the fast-forward merge strategy sounds like a fancy dance move. Let's hope it doesn't trip us up in the process!

upvoted 0 times

Willard

23 days ago

User 1: A) Yes

upvoted 0 times

...

Dahlia

2 months ago

I'm not sure if this is the best approach. Wouldn't squash merges be a better option to keep the commit history clean?

upvoted 0 times

...

2 months ago

I think the solution using fast-forward merges will meet the goal.

upvoted 0 times

...