Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-305 Topic 4 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-305 Questions]

You plan to move a web application named App! from an on-premises data center to Azure.

App1 depends on a custom COM component that is installed on the host server.

You need to recommend a solution to host App1 in Azure. The solution must meet the following requirements:

App1 must be available to users if an Azure data center becomes unavailable.

Costs must be minimized.

What should you include in the recommendation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tanja
15 days ago
Hold up, did someone say 'custom COM component'? Looks like we're in for a wild ride! I hope the Azure team has a good sense of humor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. The load balancer should help with failover, and a web app seems like the most cost-effective solution for a simple app like this.
upvoted 0 times
Mike
10 days ago
I agree, a web app should be cost-effective for hosting App1 in Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
28 days ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. The load balancer can help with high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cyndy
1 months ago
Hmm, Option D seems to address the availability requirement, but what about the cost minimization? I need to do some more research on the pricing of virtual machine scale sets vs. web apps.
upvoted 0 times
Bernardo
15 days ago
User 2: I agree, but we should research the pricing of virtual machine scale sets vs. web apps for cost minimization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
22 days ago
User 1: Option D seems to address the availability requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rasheeda
1 months ago
Why do you think option D is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
2 months ago
Option B looks promising, but I'm not sure how the custom COM component will work with a web app. Might need to dig deeper into that.
upvoted 0 times
Theodora
4 days ago
Good idea, we don't want any surprises when moving App1 to Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomas
8 days ago
Maybe we should investigate further before making a final decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederica
19 days ago
I agree, but we need to make sure the custom COM component will work with a web app.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
1 months ago
I think option B is the best choice for hosting App1 in Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryll
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
2 months ago
I think we should go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a