Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-305 Topic 4 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-305 Questions]

You have an on-premises network to which you deploy a virtual appliance.

You plan to deploy several Azure virtual machines and connect the on-premises network to Azure by using a Site-to-Site connection.

All network traffic that will be directed from the Azure virtual machines to a specific subnet must flow through the virtual appliance.

You need to recommend solutions to manage network traffic.

Which two options should you recommend? Each correct answer presents a complete solution.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Marci
1 months ago
I'm going to have to agree with the other candidates. B and D are the right answers here. Though I did chuckle at the ExpressRoute suggestion - that's overkill for this scenario!
upvoted 0 times
Cherri
1 days ago
I think we should go with option B, implementing an Azure virtual network.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brendan
2 months ago
Definitely B and D. Configuring a routing table is key to ensuring the traffic is routed through the virtual appliance. Traffic Manager is for load balancing, not for this specific requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
5 days ago
Configuring a routing table is crucial to control the flow of traffic and ensure it passes through the virtual appliance as required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evan
6 days ago
Yes, those two options will ensure that all traffic from the Azure virtual machines to the specific subnet goes through the virtual appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicki
13 days ago
That's correct, Azure Traffic Manager is not the right solution for managing network traffic in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
14 days ago
I agree, implementing an Azure virtual network and configuring a routing table are essential for managing network traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
20 days ago
Yes, configuring a routing table will ensure that all traffic from the Azure virtual machines flows through the virtual appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
1 months ago
I agree, implementing an Azure virtual network is essential for connecting the on-premises network to Azure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
2 months ago
Ha! C is a good one. ExpressRoute is for a dedicated private connection to Azure, not for managing network traffic within a virtual network. B and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
2 months ago
I'm not sure about B. Wouldn't we need to configure the routing table within the virtual network to ensure the traffic flows through the virtual appliance? I'd go with B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlen
2 months ago
I think the correct answers are B and D. Implementing an Azure virtual network and configuring a routing table to route the traffic through the virtual appliance seem like the logical solutions here.
upvoted 0 times
Francoise
2 months ago
Yes, and configuring a routing table will ensure that the traffic flows through the virtual appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
2 months ago
I agree, implementing an Azure virtual network will help with the connection.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merlyn
3 months ago
I also think configuring a routing table is necessary to ensure all traffic flows through the virtual appliance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
3 months ago
I agree with Steffanie. Implementing an Azure virtual network will help manage network traffic efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
3 months ago
I think we should implement an Azure virtual network.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77