Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Microsoft Exam AZ-305 Topic 4 Question 50 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-305 exam
Question #: 50
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-305 Questions]

You need to recommend a data storage solution that meets the following requirements:

* Ensures that applications can access the data by using a REST connection

* Hosts 20 independent tables of varying sizes and usage patterns

* Automatically replicates the data to a second Azure region

* Minimizes costs

What should you recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Audry at Feb 10, 2024, 10:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium AZ-305 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Aleisha
12 months ago
I still think A is the best choice, as it ensures that applications can access the data using a REST connection, which is a crucial requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
12 months ago
I believe C) an Azure SQL database that uses active geo-replication is also a good option, as it provides more structured data storage compared to a storage account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
12 months ago
I don't think option B is the best choice since we need a data storage solution specifically for hosting tables, not just general storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magda
1 years ago
But what about option B) tables in an Azure Storage account that use read-access geo-redundant storage (RA-GRS)?
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
1 years ago
I agree, because it meets all the requirements mentioned in the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
1 years ago
I think the answer is A) an Azure SQL Database elastic pool that uses active geo-replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
1 years ago
I agree with Vashti, option B seems like the most cost-effective and efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
1 years ago
Option B uses read-access geo-redundant storage, which can benefit our data replication needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
1 years ago
Why do you think option B is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
1 years ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonny
1 years ago
I think we should recommend option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mayra
1 years ago
Yeah, option B does seem like the most logical choice here. And hey, at least we don't have to worry about managing any databases! Storage accounts are like the lazy person's dream come true.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonard
1 years ago
I'm leaning towards option B, the Azure Storage account with RA-GRS. That provides the REST access, automatic replication, and should be more cost-effective than a full SQL database. The only potential downside is handling the varying table sizes and usage patterns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
1 years ago
Okay, let's think this through. Option A, the Azure SQL Database elastic pool with active geo-replication, could work, but it might be overkill for just 20 tables. Plus, the costs might be higher than we need.
upvoted 0 times
Bambi
1 years ago
Option B might be the best choice here, considering costs and requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
Evangelina
1 years ago
Good point, we need to ensure it can handle that
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
1 years ago
But will it be able to handle the varying sizes and usage patterns of the tables?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvonne
1 years ago
That could work since it meets all the other requirements
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
1 years ago
What about Option B, using tables in an Azure Storage account with read-access geo-redundant storage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
1 years ago
Option A could be too expensive for just 20 tables
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmelina
1 years ago
Hmm, this question seems straightforward, but it's important to really understand the requirements. We need a solution that supports REST access, has multiple tables with varying usage, and provides automatic replication to another region. And we need to minimize costs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77