Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-204 Topic 4 Question 100 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-204 exam
Question #: 100
Topic #: 4
[All AZ-204 Questions]

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You are developing an Azure Service application that processes queue data when it receives a message from a mobile application. Messages may not be sent to the service consistently.

You have the following requirements:

Queue size must not grow larger than 80 gigabytes (GB).

Use first-in-first-out (FIFO) ordering of messages.

Minimize Azure costs.

You need to implement the messaging solution.

Solution: Use the .Net API to add a message to an Azure Storage Queue from the mobile application. Create an Azure VM that is triggered from Azure Storage Queue events.

Does the solution meet the goal?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kattie
10 days ago
The solution seems to address the requirements, but I'm concerned about the scalability of the Azure VM. As the queue size grows, the VM might not be able to process the messages fast enough, leading to queue backlog. I would suggest exploring other serverless options like Azure Functions instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
19 days ago
Using the .NET API to add messages to an Azure Storage Queue and triggering an Azure VM from queue events seems like a reasonable solution. It should meet the FIFO ordering requirement, but I'm not sure it will keep the queue size under 80 GB, and the Azure VM might incur unnecessary costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
21 days ago
That's a good point. Maybe we should consider a different approach to meet all the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
27 days ago
I disagree. The solution does not address the requirement of queue size not growing larger than 80GB.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 months ago
I think the solution meets the goal because it uses FIFO ordering and helps minimize Azure costs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77