Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Microsoft Exam AZ-120 Topic 13 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Microsoft's AZ-120 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 13
[All AZ-120 Questions]

You have an SAP environment on Azure.

Your on premises network uses a 1 Gbps ExpressRoute circuit to connect to Azure. Private peering is enabled on the circuit. The default route (0.0.0.0/0) from the on-premises network is advertised.

Whenever backups are copied to Azure Blob storage, the ExpressRoute circuit is saturated.

You need to resolve the issue without modifying the ExpressRoute circuit. The solution must minimize administrative effort.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Brittney
1 months ago
Option E: Unplug the ExpressRoute circuit and see if the backups work then. Guaranteed to resolve the issue!
upvoted 0 times
...
Richelle
1 months ago
Option A, really? Changing the backup solution? Sounds like a lot of work, I'd rather not go that route.
upvoted 0 times
Ira
5 days ago
I agree, changing the backup solution seems like a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
1 months ago
I don't know, Option C is kinda strange for this scenario. Feels like a red herring to me.
upvoted 0 times
Gayla
14 days ago
D) Enable virtual network service endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
16 days ago
B) Create a user-defined route that redirects traffic to the Blob storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
18 days ago
A) Change the backup solution to use a third-party software that can write to the Blob storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Garry
2 months ago
Hmm, Option D seems like the way to go. Enables service endpoints without touching the circuit, should minimize the effort too.
upvoted 0 times
Angelica
20 days ago
Let's go with Option D then, it seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanne
1 months ago
I agree, that should help minimize the saturation on the ExpressRoute circuit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
1 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice. It enables service endpoints without changing the circuit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Floyd
2 months ago
Option B looks promising, but I'm not sure if it'll work with the requirement of 'without modifying the ExpressRoute circuit'.
upvoted 0 times
Sue
1 months ago
True, but we should also explore other options like enabling virtual network service endpoints to see if that could help alleviate the saturation issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 months ago
I agree. It's important to consider all options before making a decision to resolve the saturation issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
2 months ago
That's a good point. It might be a more efficient solution that aligns with the requirement of minimizing administrative effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
2 months ago
True, but enabling virtual network service endpoints could also help in redirecting the traffic to the Blob storage without changing the circuit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
2 months ago
Option B might still be worth considering, it could help redirect the traffic without directly modifying the circuit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
2 months ago
Option B might still be worth considering, as it could potentially redirect the traffic without directly modifying the circuit.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Berry
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Maybe enabling virtual network service endpoints could also help minimize the saturation of the circuit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pamella
2 months ago
I agree with Marguerita. It seems like the most efficient solution without modifying the ExpressRoute circuit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marguerita
3 months ago
I think we should create a user-defined route to redirect traffic to the Blob storage.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77